6 assessment of the Prosecutor in charge is that the facts, in which a joint command of the army and paramilitaries illegally entered and searched the home of the NARANJO family and injured a minor [Luisa María Escudero Jiménez], do not constitute anything different to personal injuries. Said crime is not of her competence […].” Likewise, it informed that after the order of the Inter-American Court of September 22, 2006 (supra Having Seen Paragraph 2), a meeting was held with the State’s representatives in which, among others, they agreed to promote the investigation and the reassignment of competence, however, the investigation has not had any important advances. 20. That the Inter-American Commission stated that the State omits making any reference to the progress of the investigations of the facts that justify the validity of the present provisional measures, reason for which it is correct to assume that it is still in a preliminary stage. 21. That the State has not presented information on the investigations carried out within the framework of these provisional measures, reason for which it is necessary that it refer specifically to this matter in the next state report regarding the implementation of the present measures. * * * 22. That the representative stated that on December 2, 2007 Javier Augusto Torres Durán, son-in-law of Mrs. Mery Naranjo and beneficiary of the present provisional measures, was murdered. The murder took place in the 13th County in the neighborhood las Independencias II. As stated by the representative, “[c]urrently the 13th County is living a situation of territorial domain, where the youngsters in charge of those reinserted dedicate themselves to looking out for their neighborhood […] This situation is reflected in the fact that the youngsters of the different neighborhoods can only remain where they live, since if they go beyond the ‘borders’, outside of their neighborhood, they are killed.” The representative stated that the aforementioned was precisely what happened to Javier Augusto Torres, who lived in the neighborhood of las Independencias III and in order to go to his mother’s house he had to go through las Independencias II, for which he was murdered. He argued that these facts put in evidence the danger in which the leaders of the 13th County are and the imminent risk to Mrs. Mery Naranjo, María del Socorro Mosquera, and their next of kin. 23. That the representative also brought before the Tribunal that on January 23, 2008 the youngster Juan David Naranjo, beneficiary of these provisional measures, was arrested by the Police due to facts that are a reason for an investigation by the Public Prosecutor’s Office, “[w]hich are not related with the community leader activities carried out by his mother, or with the other facts that resulted in the granting of the provisional measures.” 24. That the Tribunal has requested that the State present information on the alleged murder of Javier Augusto Torres Durán through communications CDH-S/2386 of December 7, 2007 and CDH-S/2443 of December 14, 2007, which, however, has not been forwarded. The murder of a beneficiary of provisional measures is a grave fact, whose circumstances must be clarified by the State in order to allow the Tribunal to determine how this fact is related to those that originated the adoption of the provisional measures. Therefore, this Court considers it necessary that the State present the information requested as soon as