68 circulation. The State confirmed its intention to implement this measure through a public act and to try to reach a prior agreement with the victims and their representatives on the means of compliance, including the selection of a place and date of symbolic importance. Considerations of the Court 225. As it has done in other cases,313 the Court orders the State to carry out a public act of acknowledgment of international responsibility for the facts of this case, referring to the violations established in this judgment. This act must be carried out by means of a public ceremony in the presence of senior State officials and the victims in this case. The State must reach agreement with the victims or their representatives on the method of complying with the public act of acknowledgement, as well as on its characteristics, such as the place and date on which it will be held.314 It State must also cover the cost of transporting the victims and publicizing this act in the media.315 The State has one year from notification of this judgment to implement this measure. b) Publication of the judgment 226. The representatives asked the Court to order the State to publish the full judgment once, both in the Official Gazette and in a national newspaper with wide circulation, as well as on the web page of all public institutions involved in these cases and on the web page of the Salvadoran Armed Forces. In their final arguments the representatives also called for the publication of “a segment of a popular version” of the judgment. The State acknowledged the importance of publishing the judgments issued by the Court in the country, “since this contributes to the reparation of the victims,” and agreed to publish the official summary of the judgment, once, in the Official Gazette and in a newspaper with wide national circulation, and to make the full judgment available on an official web site, for one year. Considerations of the Court 227. The Court considers, as it has in other cases,316 that, within six months of notification of this judgment, the State must publish: a) The official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in the Official Gazette; b) The official summary of this judgment prepared by the Court, once, in one (1) national newspaper with wide circulation, and c) The whole of this judgment, for one year, on one (1) official national web site, as well as on the official web site of the Armed Forces of El Salvador, in a manner accessible to the public. 228. As to the request made by the representatives in their final arguments (supra para. 226), the Court observes that it was not submitted at the proper procedural moment, that is, during the submission of the pleadings and motions brief; therefore, it is time-barred and will not be Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of December 3, 2001. Series C No. 88, para. 81, and Case of the Landaeta Mejías Brothers et al. v. Venezuela. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of August 27, 2014. Series C No. 281, para. 307. 313 Cf. Case of Kawas Fernández v. Honduras. Merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of April 3, 2009 Series C No. 196, para. 202, and Case of the Landaeta Mejías Brothers et al. v. Venezuela, supra, para. 307. 314 Cf. Case of Myrna Mack Chang v. Guatemala, supra, para. 278, and Case of Contreras et al. v. El Salvador, supra, para. 203. 315 Cf. Case of Cantoral Benavides v. Peru. Reparations and costs, supra, para. 79, and Case of Human Rights Defender et al. v. Guatemala, supra, para. 261. 316