47 179. The Court accepts it and takes notes of the approaches that the State has been making. h) Other petitions of reparation 180. The representatives requested the Court to order the State “the implementation of protection programs for leaders of indigenous communities, not just for their public safety but also to protect their ancestral culture, customs, and traditions of jurisdictional autonomy and world vision of such groups.” 181. Furthermore, they requested the adoption of the necessary measures to grant to the Indigenous Community, within a reasonable time, the rights over the ancestral territory they own. 182. In addition, they requested the Court to order the State to create a plan that facilitates the restructuring of the Community’s plan of life “leading to the recovery of their customs, usages and traditions, in order for the indigenous to cohabit accepting the indigenous form of development for all [...] without the State interference. Moreover, in relation to this issue, they requested that the mortal remains of Germán Escué be "sowed in the Mother Earth, in a place of Resguardo called 'Reserva de Vida Germán Escue,' recognized by the Government as a protected area, with the consent of the Indigenous Community of Jambaló." At last, they asked for "help" in order to restructure the 19 communal stores and the 19 communal enterprises they alleged to have lost as a consequence of the execution of Germán Escué; to rebuild the space for ceremonies of spiritual authorities; to recover the historical objects of Nasa People by means of the construction of a historic center in Vereda de Vitoyó and the strengthening of the Communal Assemblies. 183. Finally, the representatives as well as the victim’s daughter, requested in the public hearing that a "book about the life of [Germán Escué] be written145 published in Spanish and in Nasa Yute; said petition was disputed by the State. 184. Furthermore, the Commission requested during the public hearing held before this Tribunal the Court to order the State to "foster the formation processes of young leaders in Resguardo de Jambaló.”146 Said petition was disputed by the State. 185. The Court considers that the representatives and the Commission's petitions are not related to the facts subject to analysis of the present case. Therefore, the Court decides not to grant them. D) Costs and Expenses 186. As held by the Court in prior cases, costs and expenses are included within the concept of reparation as enshrined in Article 63(1) of the American Convention.147 145 Cf. Statement rendered by Myriam Zapata Escué in the public hearing held before the Court on January 29 and 30, 2007. 146 Myriam Escué also expressed her wish, during the public hearing, for the formation of “a group of young leaders in the Resguardo named after [his father's]. Cf. Statement rendered by Myriam Zapata Escué in the public hearing held before the Court on January 29 and 30, 2007. 147 Cf. Case of Garrido and Baigorria v. Argentina. Reparations, supra note 117, para. 79; Case of BuenoAlves v. Argentina, supra note 9, para. 216, and Case of the Rochela Massacre v. Colombia, supra note 7, para. 304.