54 (supra para. 97(109)), which dismissed the request filed by Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas for conversion of the arrest warrant, on the grounds that there “we[re] no elements to challen[ge] the sufficiency of the evidence considered by the A quo to order the appellant’s arrest. To that effect, the investigation procedures carried out were insufficient; therefore, it is necessary to exceptionally resort to an arrest warrant as a necessary measure to enable the appropriate development of the proceedings.”115 97(115) On December 15, 2004, the National Criminal Chamber (Sala Penal Nacional), through order No. 062, thoroughly described the charges brought against Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas, Isabel Cristina Moreno-Tarazona, Manuel Rubén Abimael GuzmánReinoso, and Héctor Aponte-Sinarahua or Arturo Guzmán-Alarcón, and stated that “based on the aforesaid,[…] Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas and Isabel Cristina MorenoTarazona, also parties to these […] proceedings, had not involvement in the events attributable to Héctor Aponte-Sinarahua or Arturo Guzmán-Alarcón in Alto Huallaga from June 1987 and July 1989 […].” Based on the foregoing, the National Criminal Chamber ordered that the proceedings initiated against Aponte-Sinarahua or GuzmánAlarcón for the acts committed in the Alto Huallaga zone be no longer joined as only the latter was involved. Furthermore, the National Criminal Chamber ordered joinder of the cases identified under No. 121-95 and 69-03 into File No. 667-03, on the grounds that both cases involved the defendant Manuel Rubén Abimael GuzmánReinoso, who was accused of being the highest leader of the organization Shining Path. The National Criminal Chamber stated that case No. 69-03 was related to events attributable to Manuel Rubén Abimael Guzmán-Reinoso, Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas, Isabel Cristina Moreno-Tarazona, and as regards Héctor Aponte-Sinarahua or Arturo Guzmán-Alarcón, only to the following events: “a) having been intercepted at the residence of [Urcesino] Ramírez-Rojas […] when together with the latter and MorenoTarazona, they were [e]valuating the terrorist actions carried out and planning to perform further subversive actions; b) […] attacking the House of Government with a ‘car bomb’ on August 13, 1990; c) having an explosive device seized from his residence in the district of Rímac; and d) having forged a Voting Record.” The National Criminal Chamber ordered that the aforementioned case be sent to the Superior Criminal Prosecutor’s Office (Fiscalía Superior Penal) “to is[sue] the pertinent prosecutorial pleading.”116 97(116) On June 2, 2005, Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas filed a brief with the National Criminal Chamber (Sala Penal Nacional) requesting to be released on bail.117 97(117) On June 24, 2005, the National Criminal Chamber (Sala Penal Nacional) reversed the de-joinder of the proceedings brought against Manuel Rubén Abimael Guzmán-Reinoso, as requested by the Public Prosecutor’s Office (Ministerio Público).118 115 Cf. Order No. 216 issued by the National Chamber for Terrorism (Sala Nacional de Terrorismo) on November 19, 2004 (case file of affidavits and comments, pages 6015 to 6017). 116 Cf. Order No. 062 issued by the National Criminal Chamber (Sala Nacional de Terrorismo) on File No. 667-03 (joinder of files 121-95 and 69-03) on December 15, 2004 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the State, volume 6, pages 5753 to 5777). 117 Cf. Brief filed by Urcesino Ramírez-Rojas with the National Criminal Chamber (Sala Penal Nacional) requesting to be released on bail, on June 2, 2005, (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives, page 63544). 118 Cf. Order issued by the National Criminal Chamber (Sala Penal Nacional) on File No. 667-03 on June 24, 2005 (case file of evidence to facilitate the adjudication of the case submitted by the representatives, page 6367).