V OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 47. Therefore, THE COURT, pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 31(3) and 68 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure, DECIDES, Unanimously, 1. To declare admissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations, and costs issued in the case of the Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. Guatemala, presented by the State of Guatemala, pursuant to paragraph seven of this judgment of interpretation. 2. To reject as inadmissible the request for interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of the Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. Guatemala, presented by the State of Guatemala, pursuant to the terms of paragraphs 15 to 17, 23 to 25, 29 to 32, 36 to 40, and 44 to 46 of this judgment of interpretation regarding operative paragraphs two, four, six, and partially, eight. 3. To partially clarify the meaning and scope of the provisions of operative paragraph eight of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs issued in the case of the Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. Guatemala, pursuant to paragraphs 46 to 48 of this judgment of interpretation. 4. To order the Court Registrar to notify the Republic of Guatemala, the victims’ representatives, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, of this judgment of interpretation. I/A Court HR. Case of the Maya Kaqchikel Indigenous Peoples of Sumpango et al. v. Guatemala. Interpretation of the judgment on merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of July 27, 2022. 13