9 essential to determine its usefulness. Finally, the Court clarifies that the State must write this report independently from the filing of the complaint by the beneficiary. 26. That once the aforementioned report is received (supra Considering 24), the Commission and the representatives will be able to submit their observations, within the term established in the operative section of this Order. * * * 27. That finally, regarding the President’s instructions that her Order of April 24, 2009 be kept confidential (supra Having Seen 1 (6)), the Court takes notice that in the private meeting held in Santiago, Chile (supra Having Seen 2), the representatives of the alleged victims in the case of González et al. (“Campo Algodonero”) vs. Mexico, who originally filed before the Court the request for provisional measures in favor of Ms. Pérez Torres, removed her request for confidentiality. Additionally, the Court observes that the current representatives of the beneficiaries of the measures have not pronounced themselves on this. Consequently, the Court does not consider it necessary to analyze this point and clarifies that the instant Order will be public, in conformity with the Court’s constant practice. THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, by virtue of the authority granted by Article 63(2) of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 26 and 30 of the Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To ratify the Order of the President of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights of April 24, 2009. 2. To call upon the State to maintain the measures it may have adopted, and to adopt forthwith the measures necessary to protect the life and integrity of Rosa Isela Pérez Torres and her immediate next of kin. 3. To require the State to submit to the Court the report indicated in Considering paragraphs 24 and 25 of this Order, no later than August 28, 2009. 4. To request that the representatives of the beneficiaries and the InterAmerican Commission submit their observations on the report mentioned in the