10. Consequently, taking into account the decision of the Constitutional Court of Peru, the information forwarded by the parties, the State’s request to lift the measures and the opinion of the Inter-American Commission (supra considering paragraphs **), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights finds that the requirements of extreme gravity, urgency and need to prevent irreparable damage to the integrity and life of the beneficiary have ceased to exist, so that it is admissible to lift these provisional measures. 11. The Inter-American Court assesses positively the references made to the American Convention on Human Rights by the Constitutional Court of Peru in this provisional proceeding in relation to compliance with the obligations of respect and guarantee established therein. Furthermore, notwithstanding the conclusion of these provisional measures, the Inter-American Court recalls that the States have the constant and permanent obligation to comply with their general obligations under Article 1(1) of the Convention to respect the rights and freedoms recognized therein and to guarantee their free and full exercise to all persons subject to their jurisdiction.5 THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of the authority conferred by Article 63(2) of the American Convention and Article 27 of its Rules of Procedure, DECIDES: 1. To lift the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights since May 29, 2010, and subsequently ratified, in order to protect the life and personal integrity of Wong Ho Wing. 2. To recall that, under Article 1(1) of the American Convention, the lifting of the provisional measures does not imply that the State is relieved of its treaty-based obligations of protection. 3. To order the Secretariat of the Court to notify this order to the Republic of Peru, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the representative of the beneficiary of these measures. 4. To close the file on this matter. 5 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez. Provisional measures with regard to Honduras. Order of the Court of January 15, 1988, third considering paragraph; Matter of the Forensic Anthropology Foundation, supra note 5, forty-first considering paragraph, and Matter of the Socio-educational Detention Unit, supra note 6, fourteenth considering paragraph. 4