-25. The e-mail of January 14, 2007, whereby Mr. Cesar Manuel Saldaña-Ramírez, representative of Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, referred to the action taken in compliance with the provisional measures and stated, inter alia, that "Peruvian authorities have discharged the personal security agents that used to protect” Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza. 6. The note of January 16, 2007, whereby the Secretary of the Court, following instructions of the President, requested the State to submit forthwith a bimonthly report on compliance with the measures since the term for presentation thereof had expired on August 12, 2006. Furthermore, following instructions of the President, the State was required to refer, in said report, to the situation alleged in the representative’s communication of January 14, 2007 regarding compliance with these measures. 7. The e-mail and appendix of February 8, 2007, whereby Mr. Samuel FernándezGómez, President of the Asociación de Familiares de Detenidos- Desaparecidos, Ejecuciones Extrajudiciales y Torturados (AFDDEET) [Association of Disappeared Detainees´ Relatives, Extrajudicial Executions and Tortured Individuals], referred to certain information on allegedly “imminent threats and attacks against […] Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza’s life,” in relation to the provisional measures ordered by the Court, and furnished a document signed by Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza and his two attorneys before this Court and stated, inter alia, that “the AFDDEET President is empowered to resort to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to enforce Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza’s and his next of kin’s rights]”. 8. The note of February 12, 2007, wherein the Secretariat of the Court, following instructions by the President, requested the State to forthwith and urgently submit (supra Having Seen Clause No. 6) its bimonthly report on the action taken in compliance with the provisional measures, as the term for its presentation had expired on August 12, 2006. 9. By the brief and appendixes of May 14, 2007, whereby Peru submitted its bimonthly report on the action taken in compliance with the provisional measures and requested the Court to "address the convenience of continuing with [these] provisional measures” and to "order Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza to comply with all domestic rules and refrain from taking illegal actions and acting recklessly and reprehensibly.” The Secretariat had received such report prior to April 26, 2007, without appendixes. 10. The e-mail and appendixes of May 16, 2007, whereby three representatives of Mr. Ramírez-Hinostroza submitted two briefs and copy of several documents. One of the briefs, which is dated May 15, 2007 and signed by Messrs. César M. Saldaña-Ramírez and Raúl A. Ramos De la Torre, highlights that due to the criminal proceedings instituted against Luis Pérez-Documet, retired general, for the crime of kidnapping against Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza, on May 14, 2007, Mr. Luis Alberto Ramírez-Hinostroza was threatened over the phone and was “required to fire his attorneys and refrain from attending the hearings to ratify the testimony rendered during the police investigation, the prosecution’s actions and the criminal court proceedings;” he was also told that his “attorneys [were] being watched and threatened and that their telephones [had] been bugged.” In this brief, Messrs. Saldaña-Ramírez and Ramos De la Torre request that “in light of the imminent risk