well as the alterations, of a non-pecuniary nature, in the conditions of the day-to-day existence of the victim or his family”.198 254. As the Court has declared the violation of articles 4(1), 4(2), 5(1), 5(2), 7(1), 7(2), 7(5), 8(1), 8(2), 8(2)(g), 8(2)(h), 9 , 11(1) and 25(1) of the American Convention and articles 1, 6 and 8 of the IACPPT, to the detriment of Mr. Valenzuela Ávila in this judgment and given the specificities of this case, the Court considers it appropriate to order compensation, in equity, for an amount of USD$60,000.00 (sixty thousand United States dollars) in favor of Tirso Román Valenzuela Ávila. In consideration of the information provided by the representatives regarding the direct next of kin of Tirso Román Valenzuela Ávila, the Court considers that said amount should be delivered to each of his next of kin, according to the following criteria: a) Fifty percent (50%) of the compensation corresponding to the victim will be distributed, in equal parts, among the victim's children, namely: Jorge Luis, Luis Fernando and Tirso Román, all with the surname Valenzuela Ruiz and their daughter and son fathered by Rosa María Mendoza López, whose identity is withheld for their safety (supra para. 52). If one or more of the children have already died, the part that corresponds to him or them will increase that of the other children of the same victim, and b) The remaining fifty percent (50%) of the compensation corresponding to the victim will be distributed, in equal parts, between the former spouse, Ludim Azucena Ruiz López, and the former partner, Rosa María Mendoza López. G. Costs and Expenses 255. The representatives requested: a) Regarding the Institute for Comparative Studies in Criminal Sciences of Guatemala (ICCPG), in the pleadings and motions brief, they requested: (i) payment for the trips made from Guatemala City to San José, Costa Rica, and to Washington, DC, in the United States, some of these trips were not exclusively related to this case, and (ii) expenses corresponding to legal work. In their final arguments, they presented a table of fees for the attorneys and assistants who worked on the case, for hourly payment where there was a disbursement by the ICCPG representing an amount of USD$76,865.19 (seventy-six thousand eight hundred and sixty-five United States dollars and nineteen cents). Finally, they requested the amount of USD$192,000.00 (one hundred and ninety-two thousand United States dollars) as the final amount, and that said amounts be repaid directly to the ICCPG. b) The IDPP, who has acted as the victims’ representative in the international process since August 2011, incurring travel expenses, lodging, legal work, did not request a specific amount. c) Regarding future expenses: they requested the expenses required to obtain future evidence and any others that might be incurred for adequate representation before the Court; in addition to considering the stage of compliance with judgment both nationally and internationally. 198 Cf. Case of the “Street Children” (Villagrán Morales et al.) v. Guatemala. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of May 26, 2001. Series C No. 77, para. 84, and Case of Gorigoitía v. Argentina, supra, para. 82. 60