for María Leontina Millacura Llaipén and Fabiola Valeria Torres and Marcos Alejandro Torres Millacura. 186 190. The State expressed that the amount requested by the representatives "exceeds, by a wide margin, the international standards on reparations." D.2.2. Considerations of the Court. 191. International jurisprudence has repeatedly established that the Judgment can constitute per se a form of reparation.187 However, considering the circumstances of the case sub judice, the Court finds it pertinent to establish an amount as compensation for non-pecuniary damages.188 192. Attending to the compensation ordered by the Tribunal in other cases on enforced disappearance of persons, in consideration of the circumstances of this case, the significance, character, and seriousness of the violations committed, the pattern of police abuse in which the disappearance took place, the suffering experienced by the victim, the time that has passed since the disappearance began, the denial of justice, the Court finds it pertinent to establish, in equity, the amount of US $50,000.00 (fifty thousand dollars of the United States of America) to the benefit of Iván Eladio Torres Millacura as compensation for non-pecuniary damages. At the same time and for the same purpose, the Tribunal establish, in equity, compensation of US $35,000.00 (thirty-five thousand dollars of the United States of America) to the benefit of Mrs. María Leontina Millacura Llaipén, as well as compensation of US $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars of the United States of America) to the benefit of Fabiola Valeria Torres and US $5,000.00 (five thousand dollars of the United States of America) to the benefit of Marcos Alejandro Torres, given that the effects to personal integrity suffered by them as a consequence of the facts in this case have been proven, as have their efforts to locate the whereabouts of their son and brother, respectively. (supra paras. 141 to 145). These amounts must be paid in the period set by the Court (infra para. 206). E. Costs and expenses. 193. As previously indicated by the Court on other occasions, costs and expenses are included in the concept of reparations enshrined in Article 63(1) of the American Convention. 189 E.1. Arguments of the parties. 194. The Commission asked the Court "to grant full reparations to the family members of Iván Eladio Torres Millacura, including […] costs from litigating on the domestic and international levels." 186 For this rubric, the representatives requrested the Court to consider the Case of Garrido and Baigorria V. Argentina. Reparations and Costs, supra note 160. 187 Cf. Case of Vera Vera et al. V. Ecuador, para. 135. 188 Cf. Case of Neira Alegría et al. V. Perú. Reparations and Costs, supra note 152, para. 56; Case of Chocrón Chocrón V. Venezuela, supra note 24, paras. 149 and 191, and Case of Mejía Idrovo V. Ecuador, supra note 17, paras. 134 and 156. 189 Cf. Case of Garrido and Baigorria V. Argentina. Reparations and Costs, supra note 160, para. 79; Case of Chocrón Chocrón V. Venezuela, supra note 24, para. 192, and Case of Mejía Idrovo V. Ecuador, supra note 17, para. 157. 55