d.2.4 Fund for prevention, protection, and support of women journalists victims of gender violence 194. In view of the human rights violations found in this judgment, the Court orders the creation of a fund, which must be used to finance programs aimed at prevention, protection, and support of women journalists who are victims of gender-based violence in the exercise of their profession, as well as for adoption of effective protection measures to guarantee the safety of women journalists who are at special risk due to the exercise of their profession, from a gender perspective. This fund shall be in addition to any other currently existing plan or program run by State entities intended for protection, support, and reparation of journalists. 195. The Court establishes, in equity, the amount of US$500,000.00 (five hundred thousand dollars of the United States of America) for the establishment of this fund. At the beginning of each year, the State must reimburse the amounts expended during the previous year up to US$500,000. This fund shall be administered by the entity designated by the State. Delegates from the "No es hora de callar" campaign and the Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa shall participate in decisions about the programs it will finance and the allocation of resources. 196. The establishment and launch of this fund must be carried out by the State in no more than 12 months from notification of this judgment. The State must annually submit a detailed report on the status of the fund, as well as on the charges to it, for five years from the issuance and submission to the Court of the first report. d.2.5 Other guarantees of non-repetition requested 197. The Court finds that the delivery of this judgment and the other reparations ordered in addition are sufficient and adequate to redress the violations suffered by the victims and does not find it necessary to order the guarantee of non-repetition measures. F. Compensation f.1 Pecuniary damage 198. In general, the Commission asked that the State adequately provide both pecuniary and nonpecuniary reparations for the human rights violations declared to the detriment of the victims. 199. The representatives requested that compensation be awarded for indirect damages and loss of future earnings in favor of the victims. They indicated that the amount for loss of future earnings could be determined based on the calculation made in the expert opinion of statistician and lawyer Fernando Ruiz. 200. The State indicated that the representatives had not presented evidence to demonstrate indirect damages or loss of future earnings. 201. In its case law, the Court has developed the concept of pecuniary damage and the situations in which it must be compensated. The Court has established that pecuniary damage involves loss of or detriment to the income of the victims, the expenses incurred as a result of the facts, and the pecuniary consequences that have a causal nexus with the facts of the case. 349 349 185. Cf. Case of Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala, supra, para. 43; and Case of Grijalva Good v. Ecuador, supra, para. 68