15 (a) repealing the judgment issued on November 12, 1999 by the Criminal Court for the First Judicial Circuit of San José (operative paragraph No. 4 of the Judgment). The State has paid the principal associated with the damages award, though there is an outstanding balance of interest and costs as explained in Considering clause No. 18 hereof. (b) adjusting its domestic legal system to the terms of Article 8(2)(h) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 2 thereof (operative paragraph No. 5 of the Judgment). 3. That it will continue to monitor compliance with the following items pending compliance in this case, to wit: (a) repealing in full the judgment issued on November 12, 1999 by the Criminal Court for the First Judicial Circuit of San José (operative paragraph No. 4 of the Judgment), with regard to the balance of interest and costs pursuant to Considering clause No. 18 hereof, and (b) adjusting its domestic legal system to the terms of Article 8(2)(h) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 2 thereof (operative paragraph No. 5 of the Judgment). And Decides: 1. To require the State to adopt all such measures as are necessary to effectively and promptly comply with the pending operative paragraphs in the Judgment on the Merits, Reparations and Costs of July 2, 2004, pursuant to Article 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights. 2. To require the State to submit to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, no later than October 15, 2009, a report stating the measures adopted to comply with the reparation measures ordered by this Court which are pending compliance, pursuant to Considering clauses No. 18 and 29 and in declaratory paragraph No. 2 hereof. 3. To require the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the victim’s representatives to submit such comments to the State’s report mentioned in the above operative paragraph as they deem appropriate, within two and four weeks, respectively, from receipt of the State's report.