protection also constituted a violation of his job stability, as part of the right to work of which he was the holder. 136. In accordance with the above, the State is responsible for the violation of the right to work, recognized in Article 26 of the Convention, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same international instrument, to the detriment of Mr. Mina Cuero. IX REPARATIONS 137. Based on Article 63(1) of the American Convention, the Court has determined that all violations of an international obligation that has produced damage leads to the duty to make adequate reparations, and this provision also includes a customary law that constitutes one of the fundamental principles of contemporary International Law related to State responsibility.115 138. Reparations for damage caused by violation of an international obligation requires, whenever possible, full restitution (restitutio in integrum), which consists of reestablishing the previously existing circumstances. If this is not possible, the court must determine measures to guarantee the infringed rights and repair the consequences of the infractions caused.116 Therefore, the Court has considered the need to provide different types of reparation so as to fully redress the damages, therefore in addition to pecuniary measures, other measures such as satisfaction, restitution, rehabilitation, and guarantees of nonrepetition have special relevance due to the damage caused.117 Similarly, this Court has determined that reparations must have a causal link to the facts of the case, the violation determined, the injuries found, and the measures requested to redress the respective damage. 118 139. Consequently, based on the violations determined in this Judgment, the Court will proceed to analyze the claims presented by the Commission and the representative, as well as the State's arguments. A. Injured party 140. This Court finds, in accordance with Article 63(1) of the American Convention, that any person declared a victim of the violation of any right in this Judgment is an injured party. Therefore, the Court considers Victor Henrry Mina Cuero to be the injured party. B. Measures of restitution 141. The Commission requested the "[r]einstatement" of Mr. Mina Cuero, "in the event that he so desires, in a position similar to the one he held in the Police, with the same remuneration, social benefits, and equivalent rank that he would currently be entitled to if he Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and Costs. Judgment of July 21, 1989. Series C No. 7, para. 25, and Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, , supra, para. 90. 116 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and Costs, supra, para. 65, and Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, supra, para. 91. 117 Cf. Case of the “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C No. 211, para. 226, and Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, supra, para. 91. 118 Cf. Case of the “Las Dos Erres” Massacre v. Guatemala. Preliminary objection, Merits, Reparations, and Costs. Judgment of November 24, 2009. Series C No. 211, para. 226, and Case of Deras García et al. v. Honduras, supra, para. 91. 115