29 and, on the other, to identify the police personnel who were in charge of the DINCOTE Detainee Oversight Office. The purpose of the third line was to identify the police agents or officials who interfered with Gladys Espinoza in the Yanamayo Prison during an inspection. 98 B.4.1. Lines of investigation relating to the facts that occurred between April 17 and June 24, 1993 87. On April 27, 2012, the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor asked the Criminal Investigation Directorate of the National Police (DIRINCRI) and the Human Resources Directorate of the National Police, to provide information, as applicable, on the police agents who were working in the DIVISE from April 16 to 19, 1993, and in the DINCOTE from April 18 to May 25, 1993. 99 In response, on November 11, 2013, after various communications had been exchanged between the different internal units of the Peruvian National Police, the names of the agents of the Peruvian National Police who were on duty in the DIREJCOTE Detainees Oversight Office over the period April 17 to June 23, 1993, including their rank, were forwarded to the Prosecutor. 100 Also, on April 27, 2012, the Prosecutor asked the Human Resources Directorate of the Peruvian National Police to forward the personnel files of several police agents. 101 In response, on May 9 and 21, 2012, the PNP remitted the said personnel files. 102 Following a request of the Prosecutor, the PNP Human Resources Directorate forwarded color photographs of these police agents. 103 On January 10, 2013, Gladys Espinoza was asked to undertake an identification procedure based on the photographs. 104 In addition, on October 18, 2013, the PNP Human Resources Directorate was asked to forward the personnel files of several police agents. 105 In response, on January 21, 2014, the Personnel Report and provisional information sheet of these officers were provided. 106 88. From 2012 to 2014, the Prosecutor ordered the reception of preliminary statements from various agents of the Peruvian National Police and, following the corresponding notifications, the 98 Cf. Testimony of Yony Efraín Soto Jiménez during the public hearing held on April 4, 2014. 99 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Criminal Investigation Directorate of the National Police of April 27, 2014 (evidence file, folio 8086); Note No. 08-2012-3FPSMP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Human Resources Directorate of the National Police of April 27, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8092), and Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the Human Resources Directorate of the National Police (evidence file, folio 8093). 100 Cf. Note No. 1690-2013-DIREJCOTEPNP-OFIADM/UNIREHUM of the Head of Administration of the DIREJCOTE to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of November 11, 2013 (evidence file, folios 11732 to 11742). Even though, on May 8 and 24, 2012, the DIRINCRI and the DIRCOTE advised that there were no files containing this information, it was provided by the PNP Human Resources Unit. Cf. Note No. 2900-2012-DIRINCRI-PNP/OFIADMUNIREHUM issued by the Human Resources Unit of the DIRINCRI on May 8, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8097), and Note No. 873-2012-DIRCOTEPNP-OFAD/UNIREHUM of the Head of Administration of the DIRCOTE to the Third Supraprovincial Criminal Prosecutor of May 24, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8172). 101 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the PNP Human Resources Directorate of April 27, 2012 (evidence file, folio 8094). 102 Cf. Note No. 139-2012-DIRREHUMPNP-DIVADLEG-DEPLEG-SECCLEG-30.ACT.PHA of the Human Resources Directorate of the National Police to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of May 9, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8098 to 8117), and Note No. 1019-2012-DIRREHUM-PNP/DIVALEG.DEPLEG-SEC-LEG.ACT of the PNP Human Resources Directorate to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of May 21, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8145 to 8153). 103 Cf. Report No. 2954-2012-DIRREHUM-PNP/OFITEL-UNINFO-BD of the PNP Human Resources Directorate to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of October 29, 2012 (evidence file, folios 8717 to 8730). 104 Cf. Photographic identification procedure carried out before the Deputy Provincial Prosecutor of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit on January 10, 2013 (evidence file, folios 8821 and 8822). 105 Cf. Note No. 08-2012-3FPS-MP-FN of the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecution Unit to the PNP Human Resources Directorate of October 18, 2013 (evidence file, folio 11438). 106 Cf. Note No. 114-2014-DIREJEPER-PNP/SEC of the Personnel Executive Directorate of the Police to the Third Supra-provincial Criminal Prosecutor of January 21, 2014 (evidence file, folios 12291 to 12303).