identified in the offer of evidence contained in the motions, arguments and evidence brief, and in the list of errata submitted subsequently. The Court will therefore assess the admissibility of these annexes at the appropriate procedural moment and, at that time, it will take the appropriate decision, even though the State’s allegation was time-barred. 44. Annex 22 47 contains records of the sessions of the public hearing during the second oral proceeding, held during the criminal trial for a crime against humanity – enforced disappearance – to the detriment of Jeremías Osorio Rivera. In view of the fact that another annex to the representatives’ brief (No. 44 analyzed infra) was originally identified as “Records of sessions of hearings of the second oral proceeding,” the Court considers that the evidence forwarded under annex 22 was opportunely offered under annex 44, as initially identified. In addition, it is pertinent to note that the State is aware of the said criminal trial and that some isolated records were also provided by the State itself; 48 therefore, their incorporation into the case file is necessary in order to assess adequately the proceedings and investigations conducted by the State. Consequently, it is in order to incorporate the said records into the body of evidence in this case. 45. Regarding annex 41, 49 the Court observes that the document added in the corrigendum consists in a “table calculating the loss of earnings.” The Court finds that this is admissible because it merely details the calculation of the amount requested by the representatives for loss of earnings in their motions and arguments brief, and it will be assessed at the appropriate moment when referring to the reparations (infra para. 279). 46. Lastly, with regard to annex 44, 50 forwarding powers of attorney and documents of the members of Jeremías Osorio Rivera’s family, the Court notes that their incorporation is pertinent in 47 Annex 22, identified as “National Criminal Chamber, Case file No. 31-06-SPN, Judgment of November 4, 2011” and in the errata document as “National Criminal Chamber, Case file No 31-06-SPN, records of hearing session”, contains the records of the session identified as: (1) “First session – November 16, 2010”; (2) “Second session – November 23, 2010”; (3) “Third session – December 7, 2010”; (4) “Fourth session – December 13, 2010”; (5) “Fifth session – December 21, 2010”; (6) “Seventh session – January 19, 2011”; (7) “Ninth session – January 27, 2011”; (8) “Eleventh session – February 17, 2011”; (9) “Thirteenth session – March 11, 2011”; (10) “Fifteenth session – March 29, 2011”; (11) “Sixteenth session – April 5, 2011”; (12) “Seventeenth session – April 7, 2011”; (13) “Eighteenth session – April 18, 2011”; (14) “Nineteenth session – April 26, 2011”; (15) “Twentieth session – May 5, 2011”; (16) “Twenty-first session – May 17, 2011”; (17) “Twenty-second session – May 26, 2011”; 18) “Twenty-third session – June 3, 2011”; (19) “Twenty-fourth session – June 9, 2011”; (20) “Twenty-fifth session – June 20, 2011”; (21) “Twenty-sixth session – July 5, 2011”; (22) “Twenty-seventh session – July 12, 2011”; (23) “Twenty-eighth session – July 14, 2011”; (24) “Twenty-ninth session – July 22, 2011”; (25) “Thirty-second session – August 15, 2011”; (26) “Thirty-third session – August 23, 2011”; (27) “Thirty-fourth session – September 6, 2011”; (28) “Thirty-fifth session – September 15, 2011”; (29) “Thirty-sixth session – September 20, 2011”; (30) “Thirty-seventh session – September 27, 2011”; (31) “Thirty-eighth session – October 4, 2011”; (32) “Thirty-ninth session – October 10, 2011”, and (33) “Fortieth session – October 24, 2011.” 48 See, for example, annexes 91 and 92 to the State’s answering brief. 49 Annex 41, identified as “Table of minimum wages,” appears in the corrigendum as “Table of minimum wages and table calculating loss of earnings.” 50 Annex 44, identified as “Records of sessions of hearings of the second oral proceeding,” and in the corrigendum as “Powers of attorney and documents of the members of Jeremías Osorio Rivera’s family,” contains the powers granted to the members of the Asociación Pro Derechos Humanos (APRODEH) by the following: 1) Santa Fe Gaitán Calderón on August 15, 2012; 2) Edith Laritza Osorio Gaytán on August 9, 2012; 3) Neida Rocío Osorio Gaitán on August 9, 2012; 4) Vannesa Judith Osorio Gaitán on August 15, 2012; 5) Jersy Jeremías Osorio Gaitán on August 15, 2012; 6) Epifanía Alejandrina Osorio Rivera on October 1, 2012; 7) Elena Máxima Osorio Rivera (widow of Echevarría) on October 3, 2012; 8) Adelaida Osorio Rivera on October 3, 2012; 9) Silvia Osorio Rivera on October 3, 2012; 10) Mario Osorio Rivera on October 1, 2012, and 11) Porfirio Osorio Rivera on August 20, 2012. It also contains the following documents: 1) Official certificate of completion of secondary education of [Jersy J]eremías Osorio Rivera of October 5, 2012; 2) National identity card of Santa Fe Gaitán Calderón; 3) National identity card of Edith Laritza Osorio Gaytán; 4) National identity card of Neida Rocío Osorio Gaitán; 5) National identity card of Vanessa Judith Osorio Gaitán; 6) National identity card of Jersy Jeremías Osorio Gaitán; 7) National identity card of Silvia Osorio; 8) National identity card of Adelaida Osorio Rivera; 9) National identity card of 18