ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* OF JULY 6, 2011 CASE OF THE DOS ERRES MASSACRE v. GUATEMALA MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The judgment on preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) on November 24, 2009, in which it ordered, inter alia, that: 8. The State must investigate, without delay, in a serious and effective manner, the facts that originated the violations declared in th[e] judgment in order to prosecute and, as appropriate, punish those responsible, in the terms of paragraphs 231 to 236 of th[e] judgment. 9. The State must file the necessary disciplinary, administrative or criminal actions, according to its domestic law, against those State authorities who may have committed the facts and obstructed the investigation, in the terms of paragraph 233(d) of th[e] judgment. 10. The State must adopt the necessary measures to amend the Law on Amparo, Habeas Corpus y Constitutionality in Guatemala, in the terms of paragraphs 238 to 242 of [the] judgment. 11. The State must proceed with the exhumation, identification and return to the next of kin of the mortal remains of the people who died in the Dos Erres Massacre, in the terms of paragraphs 244 to 249 of [the] judgment. 12. The State must provide training courses on human rights for different State authorities, in the terms of paragraphs 251 to 254 of [the] judgment. 13. The State must publish, once, in the Official Gazette and in another national newspaper, Chapters I, VIII; IX and X; paragraph 222 of Chapter XI, and paragraphs 225, 229 to 236, 238 to 242, 244 to 249, 251 to 254, 256, 259 to 264, 265, 268 to 270, 271 to 274 and 283 to 291 of Chapter XII of th[e] judgment, including the titles of each chapter and the corresponding section — without the corresponding footnotes — as well as the operative paragraphs. In addition, the entire judgment must be published, for at least one year, on an appropriate official website of the State, in the terms of paragraph 256 of th[e] judgment. 14. The State must organize the public acts ordered, in the terms of paragraphs 259 to 264 of th[e] judgment. 15. The State must erect a monument, in the terms of paragraph 265 of th[e] judgment. * Judge Alberto Pérez Pérez informed the Court that, for reasons beyond his control, he was unable to take part in the deliberation and signature of this order.