ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS* OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2012 CASE OF ‘LAS DOS ERRES’ MASSACRE v. GUATEMALA MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on the preliminary objection, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter, the "Judgment") delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter, the "Inter-American Court" or "the Court”) on November 24, 2009. 2. The Order on Monitoring Compliance with Judgment of July 6, 2011, in which the Court declared, inter alia, that: […] 3. […T]he Court will keep the procedure open to monitor compliance with those aspects that remain pending compliance in this case, namely: a) To investigate, without delay, in a serious and effective manner, the facts that gave rise to the violations declared in the judgment, in order to prosecute and, as appropriate, punish those responsible (eighth operative paragraph of the judgment); b) To initiate the pertinent disciplinary, administrative or criminal actions under domestic law, against the State authorities who may have committed the facts and obstructed the investigation of them (ninth operative paragraph of the judgment); c) To adopt the pertinent measures to amend the Law on Amparo, Habeas Corpus and Constitutionality in Guatemala (tenth operative paragraph of the judgment); d) To proceed with the exhumation, identification and return to their next of kin of the remains of those who died during the Dos Erres massacre (eleventh operative paragraph of the judgment); e) To implement training courses on human rights for different State authorities (twelfth operative paragraph of the judgment); f) g) To organize the public acts ordered (fourteenth operative paragraph); To erect a monument (fifteenth operative paragraph); h) To provide the psychological and medical treatment required by the 155 victims (sixteenth operative paragraph); i) To create a webpage to search for children abducted and illegally retained (seventeenth operative paragraph); and * Judge Margarette May Macaulay informed the Tribunal that, due to force majeure reasons, she could not participate in the deliberation and signature of this Order.