Order of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights * of October 18, 2007 Case of Gómez Palomino v. Perú (Monitoring of Compliance with Judgment) HAVING SEEN: 1. The Judgment on merits, reparations, and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court”, “the Inter-American Court”, or “the Tribunal”) on November 22, 2005, through which it: DECID[ED]: Unanimously, 1. To admit the acknowledgment of international responsibility made by the State of Peru, in the terms of paragraphs 32, 35 through 38 and 42 of the […] judgment. DECLAR[ED]: Unanimously, that: 2. The State violated the rights enshrined in Articles 4 (Right to Life), 5(1) and 5(2) (Right to Humane Treatment), and 7(1), 7(2), 7(3), 7(4), 7(5), and 7(6) (Right to Personal Liberty of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) (Obligation to Respect Rights) of the same, in detriment of Mr. Santiago Gómez Palomino, pursuant to the acknowledgment of international responsibility made by the State and in the terms of paragraphs 35 and 36 of the […] Judgment. 3. The State violated the rights enshrined in Articles 8(1) (Right to a Fair Trial) and 25 (Right to Judicial Protection) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same, in detriment of Mr. Santiago Gómez Palomino, Mrs. Victoria Margarita Palomino Buitrón, Esmila Liliana Conislla Cárdenas, María Dolores Gómez Palomino, Luzmila Sotelo Palomino, Emiliano Palomino Buitrón, Mercedes Palomino Buitrón, Mónica Palomino Buitrón, Rosa Palomino Buitrón, and Margarita Palomino Buitrón, and the child Ana María Gómez Guevara, pursuant to the acknowledgment of international responsibility made by the State and in the terms of paragraphs 38 and 74 through 86 of the […] Judgment. 4. The State violated the right enshrined in Article 5 (Right to Humane Treatment) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in relation to Article 1(1) of the same, in detriment of Mrs. Victoria Margarita Palomino Buitrón, Esmila Liliana Conislla Cárdenas, María Dolores Gómez Palomino, Luzmila Sotelo Palomino, Emiliano Palomino Buitrón, Mercedes Palomino Buitrón, Mónica Palomino Buitrón, Rosa Palomino Buitrón, and Margarita Palomino Buitrón, and the child Ana María Gómez Guevara, pursuant to the acknowledgment of international responsibility made by the State and in the terms of paragraphs 37 and 59 through 68 of the […] Judgment. 5. The State has failed to comply with the obligations established in Article 2 (Domestic Legal Effects) of the American Convention on Human Rights, to duly guarantee the rights to life, to personal liberty, and to humane treatment of Mr. Santiago Gómez Palomino and Article I(b) of the Inter-American Convention on Forced Disappearances of Persons, in the terms of paragraphs 91 through 110 of the […] Judgment. * The present Order was issued in the XXXI Extraordinary Session, held in the city of Bogota, Colombia, during October 16-19, 2007.

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents