102 corresponding to the violation of the right to property, private and family life and home, and has established a measure of restitution in that regard. Therefore, the Court considers that it is not appropriate to make any determination on this point beyond what has already been established. 343. The Court considers, as it has done in other cases of forced disappearances, 380 that in this case, in which the whereabouts of the victims are unknown, it is possible to apply the criteria of compensation for the victims’ loss of income, which includes the income that they would have received during their probable lifetime. In this regard, given that seven of the victims of forced disappearance were between 8 months and 6 years of age, the Court does not have elements to measure the loss of income or the damage to a life project. However, taking into account the victims’ ages at the time of their disappearance, the evidence in the case file and the principle of equity, the Court decides to establish the following amounts: a) US$ 50,000.00 (fifty thousand United States dollars) for loss of income for each of the victims of forced disappearance who were adults at the time of the events: Antonia Hilario Quispe, Magdalena Hilario Quispe, Mercedes Carhuapoma de la Cruz, Dionicia Guillén Riveros, Ramón Hilario Morán and Elihoref Huamaní Vergara. b) US$ 20,000.00 (twenty thousand United States dollars) for loss of income for each of the victims of forced disappearance who were adults aged 59 to 60 at the time of the events: Francisco Hilario Torres and Dionicia Quispe Mallqui. c) US$ 20,000.00 (twenty thousand United States dollars) for loss of income for each of the victims of forced disappearance who were children at the time of the events: Yesenia Osnayo Hilario, Miriam Osnayo Hilario, Edith Osnayo Hilario, Wilmer Hilario Carhuapoma, Alex Jorge Hilario, Raúl Hilario Guillén, Héctor Hilario Guillén. 344. The amounts ordered in favor of the persons indicated in the preceding paragraph must be paid to their next of kin within one year, in accordance with the criteria established in paragraph 339 of this judgment. E. Costs and expenses Arguments of the parties and the Commission 345. The Commission did not present arguments in this regard. The representatives requested, with respect to the Asociación Paz y Esperanza, that the State be ordered to pay the sum of USD $160,507.00 for the expenses incurred in the legal representation of the next of kin during the domestic and international judicial proceedings over the course of 22 years. Said expenses would include investigation and evidence gathering, notarization of documents, preparation of legal briefs, and travel expenses to various government agencies in the country in order to conduct the litigation of the case before that international body. Likewise, for expenses related to attendance at the public hearing of the case in Costa Rica, they requested the sum of USD $2,021.77. In the case of the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL), they indicated that said organization had joined the litigation of the case in the international proceedings and had acted as a representative since the processing of the case before the Commission. They indicated that in order to carry out this work, CEJIL had incurred expenses that included travel, hotel accommodation, communications, photocopies, stationery and mailing expenses, as well as time dedicated to legal work specifically related to the case and the investigation, such as the compilation and presentation of evidence, including interviews and preparation of briefs. They asked the Court to set in equity the sum of USD $4,095.56, as well as the reimbursement of USD 380 Cf. Case of Velásquez Rodríguez v. Honduras. Reparations and costs, supra, paras. 46 and 47, and Case of Chitay Nech et al. v. Guatemala, supra, para. 269.