92 poverty and extreme poverty, with the system providing both medical and psychological care. The SIS coverage includes the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of illnesses such as depression, anxiety, schizophrenia and alcoholism, among others. Regarding family members who do not have this insurance, the State indicated that it would take the necessary steps to ensure that such persons can be enrolled in the SIS and enjoy the coverage currently provided by the insurance. Considerations of the Court 307. In Chapter IX.IV of this judgment, the Court concluded that the forced disappearance of the fifteen victims caused harm to the psychological and moral integrity of their next of kin. Regarding the State’s argument on the health care services provided by the Integral Health System (SIS), 355 the Court finds it necessary to clarify that the reparation measures that the Court may order are directly related to the human rights violations declared in this case. 356 308. Therefore, as it has done in other cases, 357 the Court deems it necessary to order a measure of reparation that provides appropriate treatment for the psychological and physical suffering of the victims resulting from the violations established in this judgment. In order to contribute to the reparation of the harm caused, the Court establishes the obligation of the State to provide free of charge, through its specialized health institutions, and in an immediate, adequate, comprehensive and effective manner, medical and psychological or psychiatric treatment to the victims who so request it, with their prior informed consent, including the free supply of any medications that may be required, taking into consideration their specific ailments. This means that the victims should receive a preferential treatment in relation to the formalities and procedures that should be carried out in order to obtain assistance in public institutions. 358 Likewise, the respective treatment should be provided, as far as possible, at the health centers closest to their places of residence 359 in Peru, and for as long as necessary. In providing psychological or psychiatric treatment, the particular circumstances and needs of each victim should also be taken into account, so that collective, family and individual treatment is provided, in agreement with each of them and after an individual evaluation. 360 The victims who request this measure of reparation, or their legal representatives, have six months from the date of notification of this judgment to inform the State of their intention to receive medical, psychological or psychiatric care. 361 C.3. Satisfaction C.3.1. Publication and dissemination of this judgment In this regard, the State provided evidence showing that Zósimo Hilario Quispe, Víctor Carhuapoma de la Cruz and Abilio Hilario Quispe were affiliated to the Integrated Health System (SIS) since they were registered in the Single Registry of Victims (RUV). Gregorio Hilario Quispe, Zenón Cirilo Osnayo Tunque and Marcelo Hilario Quispe were beneficiaries of the SIS but the first two had their inscription in the RUV suspended and the latter’s registration is pending. Marino Huamaní Vergara no era beneficiary of the SIS and was not registered in the RUV. Cf. Certificates of Accreditation del Council of Reparations, Single Registry of Victims of September 8, 2008 (evidence file, folios 3869 a 3875 and 3877), and Brief of the Executive Secretary of the High Level Multisectoral Commission in charge of the actions and State policies regarding peace, collective reparations and national reconciliation (evidence file, folios 4714 and 4715). 356 Cf. Case of Espinoza Gonzáles v. Peru. Preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs. Judgment of November 20, 2014. para. 313 357 Cf. Case of Barrios Altos v. Peru. Reparations and costs, supra, paras. 42 and 45, and Case of Rochac Hernández et al. v. El Salvador, supra, para. 219. 358 Cf. Case of Heliodoro Portugal v. Panama. Monitoring compliance with judgment. Order of the Inter-American Court of May 28, 2010, considering paragraph 28, and Case of Osorio Rivera and Family Members v. Peru, supra, para. 256. 359 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 270, and Case of Osorio Rivera and Family Members v. Peru, supra, para. 256. 360 Cf. Case of the Dos Erres Massacre v. Guatemala, supra, para. 270, and Case of Osorio Rivera and Family Members v. Peru, supra, para. 256. 361 Cf. Case of Rosendo Cantú et al. v. Mexico, supra, para. 253, and Osorio Rivera and Family Members v. Peru, supra, para. 256. 355