based his opinion on the events verified by the journalist himself.” 20 To the contrary, one or other of the Messrs. Mémoli, or both, accused the complainants as possible authors or accessories to the offense of fraud, referred to them as “criminals,” “unscrupulous,” “corrupt” and said that “they used subterfuges (tretas) and deceit (manganetas).” III. Conclusion 20. Based on all the above, I ratify my full endorsement of the judgment and issue this separate opinion in which I have emphasized some particularly important aspects. Alberto Pérez Pérez Judge Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 20 Case of Kimel v. Argentina, supra, para. 92. 7