Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of Trujillo-Oroza v. Bolivia Judgment of February 27, 2002 (Reparations and Costs) In the Trujillo Oroza case, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Court” or “the InterAmerican Court”) composed of the following judges*: Antônio A. Cançado Trindade, President Alirio Abreu Burelli, Vice President Hernán Salgado Pesantes, Judge Oliver Jackman, Judge Sergio García Ramírez, Judge Carlos Vicente de Roux Rengifo, Judge, and Charles N. Brower, Judge ad hoc; also present, Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Secretary, and Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Deputy Secretary, in accordance with Articles 29, 55, 56 and 57 of the Rules of Procedure of (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”)**, in relation to Article 63(1) of the Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the Convention”) and in compliance with the third operative paragraph of the of January 26, 2000, delivers this judgment on reparations. I COMPETENCE the Court American American judgment 1. As established in Articles 62 and 63(1) of the Convention, the Court is competent to decide on reparations, costs and expenses in the instant case, because the State of Bolivia (hereinafter “the State” or “Bolivia”) has been a State Party to the American Convention since July 19, 1979, and acknowledged the obligatory jurisdiction of the Court on July 27, 1993. II * Judge Máximo Pacheco Gómez advised the Court that, owing to circumstances beyond his control, he would be unable to attend the fifty-fourth regular session of the Court; therefore, he did not take part in the deliberation and signature of this judgment. ** Pursuant to the order of the Court of March 13, 2001, on Transitory Provisions to the Rules of Procedure of the Court, in force since June 1, 2001, this judgment on reparations is delivered in the terms of the Rules of Procedure adopted in the order of the Court of September 16, 1996.