4 4) To require the State to inform the Inter-American Court of Human Rights within ten days of notification of the [...] Order about the measures adopted to comply with it. 5) To request the beneficiaries of these measures or their representatives to submit any observations they deem pertinent to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights within five days of notification of the State’s report. 6) To request the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to submit any observations it deems pertinent to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights within seven days of notification of the State’s report. 7) To request the State, following the report indicated in the fourth operative paragraph, to continue reporting to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights every two months on the provisional measures adopted, and to request the beneficiaries of [the] measures or their representatives, and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, to submit their observations within four and six weeks, respectively, of notification of the State’s reports. […] 8. The notes of the Secretariat of April 24, 2006, in which it notified the Order of the President of the Court of April 21, 2006, to the State, the Commission, and the representatives of the beneficiaries (hereinafter “the representatives”). 9. that; a) b) c) d) e) The State’s brief of May 24, 2006, in which Guatemala indicated, inter alia, The precautionary measures requested by the Inter-American Commission in this case had been implemented since March 2002; The Presidential Human Rights Commission (hereinafter “COPREDEH”) had been working with the Comité de Impulso composed of the Attorney General’s Office, the Ministry of Governance, COPREDEH and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to monitor and comply with the Commission and the Court’s recommendations and their requirements of the State of Guatemala; On April 28, 2006, the State, through the Ministry of Governance and COPREDEH, had made commitments regarding the requirements of Fredy Armando Peccerelli Monterroso and the Foundation; On May 19, 2006, the Ministry of Governance had ensured the beneficiaries that it would: i) Appoint a member of the National Civil Police (PNC) to be in charge of all matters relating to the safety of FAFG; ii) Inform FAFG of any change or transfer of the agents of the Civil National Police assigned to it; iii) Issue the agents assigned to provide security to Fredy Peccerelli and his next of kin with “a General Services order,” signed by the PNC Director General, in order to identify them as members of the security forces and also as agents assigned by the State to provide personal security to the beneficiaries; iv) Instruct only one unit of the National Civil Police to appoint and monitor the agents responsible for the security of the beneficiaries; and v) Establish coordination with all the sub-stations and departmental police stations to assign uniformed agents permanently to the places where exhumations are being conducted; Regarding the commitments assumed through COPREDEH, these are: i) To reach an agreement with the Secretariat of Administrative Matters and Security (hereinafter “SAAS”) concerning the security of the children of the Executive Director of the Foundation; ii) To reach an agreement with SAAS concerning training in “executive security” for the agents responsible for the security of the beneficiaries. In this regard, on May 19, 2006, COPREDEH requested SAAS to provide personal security and was awaiting a reply from the Secretariat; iii) To request the Prosecutor General’s Office and the Attorney General to combine all the documents related to the investigation in one file and to provide a report on the actual status of the investigations; and