which it complies with the public act of acknowledgement, as well as the required characteristics, such as the place and date. The State has one year from notification of this judgment to comply with this measure. iii) Scholarships 335. The representatives argued that “the facts of the case had a direct impact on the education of some members of the family; the mere fact that they were forced to move from their community interrupted their educational continuity.” They added that several of the next of kin had expressed their interest in being able to return to their studies and even undertake university studies, but, owing to the instability of their situation, they have been unable to fulfill this wish. In the case of Darelbis, Sarais, Víctor Daniel, Beatriz Adriana, Luisa del Carmen and Jorge Antonio Barrios, they could have completed their high school certificate and be enrolled in the university, but this project has been obstructed by the facts. The representatives concluded that “[t]he statements of the next of kin provided to the Court refer to this point in greater detail.” 336. The Court has established in this judgment that several members of the Barrios family had to move as a result of the facts; have undergone the disintegration of the family, and the facts have had aftereffects at the personal, physical and emotional levels. The representatives indicated that the facts had an impact on the education of some members of the family and referred to the expression of interest “of the next of kin” to return to their studies. However, they did not specify who they were referring to, but merely forwarded a “list with the level of schooling of the Barrios family,” which included the deceased victims in this case. Notwithstanding the lack of specific information provided by the representatives, the Court infers that the circumstances and adverse effects in the instant case may have had an impact on the education of the children of the deceased victims, as well as on the children who were victims of displacement. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds it appropriate to order, as a measure of satisfaction in this case, as it has in others,416 that the State must grant scholarships in Venezuelan public institutions to Jorge Antonio Barrios Ortuño, Carlos Alberto Ortuño, Ronis David Barrios Alzul, Roniel Alberto Barrios Alzul, Benito Antonio Barrios Rangel, Annarys Alexandra Barrios Rangel, Michael Jose Barrios Espinosa, Dinosca Alexandra Barrios Espinosa, Luis Alberto Alzul, Orianny Nazareth, Oriana Nazareth, Luilmari Carolina Guzman Barrios, Luiseidys Yulianny Guzmán Barrios, Danilo David Solórzano, Elvis Sarais Colorado Barrios, Cirilo Antonio Colorado Barrios, Lorena del Valle Pugliese Barrios, Génesis Andreina Navarro Barrios, Victor Tomás Navarro Barrios, Heilin Alejandra Navarro Barrios, Marcos Antonio Díaz Barrios, Sandra Marivi Betancourt Barrios and Junior Jose Betancourt Barrios, that cover the educational costs corresponding to enrolment and educational material, until the conclusion of their advanced education, whether they undertake vocational or university studies. The State’s compliance with this obligation means that the beneficiaries must take certain steps to exercise their right to this measure of reparation. Therefore, those who request this measure of reparation, or their legal representatives, have six months from notification of this judgment, to request their scholarships from the State. 3. Guarantees of non-repetition i) Training programs for officials 416 Cf. Case of the Gómez Paquiyauri Brothers, supra note 61, para. 237, and Case of Fernández Ortega et al., supra note 175, para. 257. 103