5 * * 10. That regarding operative paragraph nine, related to the publication of the proven facts, without footnotes and the operative part of the Judgment, the State reported that it had made such publication on June 25, 2007 in the “Heraldo” which is a national newspaper and the State further informed that in the near future such information would be published in the Official Gazette (supra Having Seen Clause 2.) 11. That the representatives confirmed that the publication under the terms ordered by the Court had been made in the “Heraldo”, which is a nationwide distributed newspaper, and such representatives further stated that the information was pending publication in “La Gaceta” which is the Official Gazette of the State. Finally, they stated that the term fixed by the Court to complete the publication was overdue (supra Having Seen Clause 3.) 12. That the Commission in its comments of January 8, 2007, valued the publication made by the State in a newspaper of national circulation and stated that it hoped that the publication of the pertinent parts of the Judgment ordered by the Court would be made in a short time in the Official Gazette. In view of the aforesaid, the Commission considered that the State had partially complied with this operative paragraph (supra Having Seen Clause 4.) 13 That pursuant to the information submitted by the parties, the Court considers that the State has partially complied with operative paragraph nine of the Judgment (supra Having Seen Clause 1.) * * * 14 That with regard to operative paragraph ten, relating to the performance of a public act of acknowledgement of international responsibility by the State, the State reported that through the Secretary of State’s office departments of Government and Justice, a public act was conducted by means of which “the State publicly acknowledged its international responsibility in the instant case, acknowledging the illegal detention, torture and extrajudicial execution of Marco Antonio Servellón-García, Rony Alexis Betancourth-Vásquez, Diomedes Obed García-Sánchez y Orlando Álvarez-Ríos, and further acknowledging the impunity that is still present in this case, and also apologized to the victims and their next of kin.” The State also reported that for such act, a press conference was convened and that “several communication media were present and therefore, it was widely covered” (supra Having Seen Clause 2.) 15. That the representatives, in their first comments, confirmed the information provided by the State. However, they pointed out that the public act conducted on April 18, 2007 had not complied with the purpose of repairing the damage caused to the victims and their next of kin, since the next of kin had not been taken into account in the preparation and the making of the act, and “Casa Alianza” was given notice of such act only two hours before the time scheduled for its commencement. They further stated