97. The IACHR thus finds that the Chilean State placed an arbitrary restriction on the exercise of freedom of expression by imposing subsequent liability that failed to comply with the requirements established in the Convention. Based on this, it concludes that the State violated Article 13(2) of the American Convention, in conjunction with articles 1(1) and 2 of the same instrument, to the detriment of Daniel Urrutia Laubreaux. V. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 98. The Commission concludes that the Chilean State is responsible for the violation of the rights established in articles 8(1), 8(2)(b), 8(2)(c) (fair trial), 9 (principle of legality), 13(2) (freedom of thought and expression), and 25(1) (judicial protection) of the American Convention on Human Rights, in conjunction with the obligations established in articles 1(1) and 2 of the Convention. 99. Based on the analysis and conclusions found in this report, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS RECOMMENDS THAT THE STATE OF CHILE: 1. Adopt the administrative or any other measures necessary to fully reverse the sanction imposed on Daniel Urrutia Laubreaux, including by eliminating it from his personnel record in the Judicial Branch. 2. Provide comprehensive reparations for the violations declared in this report, including both material and moral damages, through appropriate measures of compensation and satisfaction. 3. Order measures of non-repetition, including adjusting domestic law to eliminate the grounds on which this case was based and ensure that disciplinary grounds related to the right to freedom of expression of judges are compatible with the principle of legality and the right to freedom of expression as analyzed in this report. 17