Inter-American Court of Human Rights Case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado-Alfaro et al.) v. Peru Judgment of November 30, 2007 (Request for Interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs) In Case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees (Aguado-Alfaro et al.) v. Peru, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”), composed of the following judges: Sergio García-Ramírez, President; Antônio A. Cançado-Trindade, Judge; Cecilia Medina-Quiroga, Judge; Manuel E. Ventura-Robles, Judge, and Diego García-Sayán, Judge; also present, Pablo Saavedra-Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares-Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary; pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”) and Article 59 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), resolves on the request for interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs delivered by the Court on November 24, 2006 in Case of the Dismissed Congressional Employees (AguadoAlfaro et al.) v. Peru (hereinafter “the request for interpretation”), submitted by Adolfo Fernández-Saré, a victim and also the representative of one of the groups of victims, on March 8, 2007. I FILING OF THE REQUEST FOR INTERPRETATION AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 1. On March 8, 2007, Adolfo Fernández-Saré, a victim in the case at hand and the representative of one of the groups of victims, submitted a request for the interpretation of the Judgment on Preliminary Objections, Merits, Reparations and Costs rendered by the