6 19. That the Court points out that the information included in the State’s last communication of March 23, 2007 regarding compliance of this point o the Judgment was transmitted to the parties without receiving any objection in this regard from the Inter-American Commission or the representatives. On its part, the Tribunal has verified that the entire Judgment is published on the website of the Human Rights Office of Chile’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and it has accessed said text on several occasions without problem. * * * 20. That in relation to the State’s duty to leave without effect, in all their aspects, the convictions issued against Mr. Humberto Palamara Iribarne, Chile first informed that “it [was] studying, along with the corresponding public authorities, a mechanism that will allow the elimination of the criminal records in the registry corresponding to Mr. Humberto Palamara Iribarne.” This “would permit to leave without effect the main consequence of the judgments issued in cases number 471 and 434, whose sentences were already served by Mr. Palamara prior to the Inter-American’s ruling on this case.” The State mentioned that “it hope[d] to have in the near future the administrative decision that will allow it to eliminate Mr. Palamara’s criminal records” and that “[t]he advances of this process are being […] communicated to the legal representative of [Mr. Palamara].” Later, on August 2007 the State informed the Court that on June 5, 2007 it complied with “the elimination of [the criminal antecedents] that affected Mr. Humberto Palamara.” Finally, in November 2007 the State forwarded the copies of the “official letter through which the National Director of the Civil Registry and Identification inform[ed] of the elimination of the cases No. 464 and 471 […]” and of a certificate of criminal antecedents issued on October 26, 2007, in which it can be read that Mr. Humberto Antonio Palamara Iribarne appears “without antecedents” in the General Registry of Convictions. 21. That the representatives observed “with concern the fact that having expired the six-month term […] for the State to adopt all the judicial and administrative measures as well as those of any other nature necessary to leave the military criminal proceedings instituted against Mr. Palamara Iribarne and their convictions without effect, including the elimination of the criminal records from the corresponding registry, the Chilean State ha[d] not yet complied with this obligation causing the victim serious damages.” The representatives stated that Mr. Palamara Iribarne, could not resume his normal life after the occurred facts that were object of the proceedings presented before the Court and “that having the six-month term granted by the Court for the State of Chile to comply with this operative paragraph expired and more than a year after the judgment was issued, the damages caused to Mr. Palamara Iribarne have not been repaired and his rights continue to be affected.” Therefore, they asked the Court “to require the State’s prompt compliance with the obligation […].” On September 13, 2007 the representatives requested that the State be required to present a copy of the determination that ordered the elimination of the antecedents of Mr. Palamara Iribarne along with a current certificate of criminal antecedents. In its brief of November 12, 2007 the representatives stated that they are […] please[d] with that informed by the State of Chile in the understanding that the elimination of ‘the cases’ that affected Mr. Palamara have full legal effects –administrative, police, and judicial- so that in the future the judicial procedures and the convictions issued against Mr. Palamara can never be invoked.” (supra Having Seen paragraph 3). 22. That the Inter-American Commission stated first that “it shares the concern expressed by the representatives of the injured party and considers it very important that the State inform of the efforts made in order to complete the internal processes and

Select target paragraph3