21. The State advised that it was coordinating with the Ombudsman’s Office because it had not received observations on the content of the obligation. Once it received communication D.P. 1947/2009 of July 3, 2009, indicating that the document relating to the publication of the judgment did not require any consideration or observation, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs coordinated the publications. The said publications were made on June 8, 2009, in the Official Gazette, official edition No. 0121, and on June 7, 2009, in a relevant section of La Razon, a national newspaper. 22. The representatives did not make any observations on this operative paragraph. 23. Regarding the publications ordered, the Commission indicated that it is not possible to identify the date or the name of the paper in which the publication in the national newspaper was made from the document provided as evidence. However, given the absence of observations on this matter by the representatives, the Commission considered that the available information indicated adequate compliance with this aspect of the judgment. 24. Based on the information provided by the State and the Inter-American Commission, the Court observes that the State has complied fully with the thirteenth operative paragraph of the judgment. E) Regarding the obligation to implement the agreements for the provision of the medical and psychological treatment required by Honoria Estrada de Ticona, César Ticona Olivares, Hugo Ticona Estrada, Betzy Ticona Estrada and Rodo Ticona Estrada (fourteenth operative paragraph of the judgment) 25. In its report of May 21, 2010, the State indicated that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs had taken the corresponding measures with the Ministry of Health and Sports to implement the health agreements. In this regard, it had requested a report from said Ministry in order to have a record of what is being done and this will be duly presented to the Court. 26. In this regard, in their observations of August 11, 2010, the representatives stated that the said agreements have not been truly and effectively implemented; therefore, they asked the Court to urge the State to provide the medical and psychological treatment to the said victims, as ordered in the judgment. 27. For its part, in its brief of December 13, 2010, the Inter-American Commission observed that the State’s second report did not refer to this obligation and it hoped that, in the next report, the State would present detailed information on the implementation of the health agreements and the way in which the medical and psychological treatment is being provided to the beneficiaries of this measure of reparation. 28. Based on the foregoing, the Court observes that the State has not provided specific information on the steps taken to comply with this measure and, according to the information provided by the representatives and the Commission, the State has not implemented this measure effectively. In this regard, the Court considers that the State must adopt immediately all the necessary and relevant measures to provide Honoria Estrada de Ticona, César Ticona Olivares, Hugo Ticona Estrada, Betzy Ticona 8