Estrada and Rodo Ticona Estrada with the appropriate medical and psychological treatment. Consequently, the Court finds it necessary that the State report, in detail, on the measures implemented and their results. F) Regarding the obligation to provide CIEDEF with the necessary human and material resources within a reasonable time. To this end, the judgment indicated that, within one year, the State must formulate a specific proposal with a program of action and plan in relation to compliance with this provision (fifteenth operative paragraph of the judgment) 29. The State indicated that, on April 15, 2010, the Ministry of Justice had advised that in order to comply with the mandate given to CIEDEF, and pursuant to the National Development Plan, it had launched the project “Contribution to the full exercise of human rights and the strengthening of democracy,” which is intended to contribute to the reparation of human rights in order to strengthen democracy in Bolivia through the clarification of cases of forced disappearances resulting from political violence between 1964 and 1982. In this regard, it referred to the objectives of this project and indicated it was being implemented with the technical and financial cooperation of the Governments of Denmark, Sweden and Argentina. Regarding the provision of human and material resources for CIEDEF, it indicated that the Ministry of Justice was in the process of hiring experts (an anthropologist, an archaeologist, a social communicator, a librarian, a systems engineer, a social researcher, four consultants, including lawyers and historians) through a public competition. Lastly, with regard to the preparation of a proposal for an action and planning program, it advised that the Ministry of Justice had reported that it has established specific tasks in its 2010 Annual Plan of Operations to comply with this. 30. Subsequently, on August 31, 2010, the State advised that it had scheduled the execution of the project “Contribution to the full exercise of human rights and the strengthening of democracy” over 36 calendar months, divided into three stages (years). This project comprises various actions to be taken in order to find the remains of the victims of forced disappearances during the de facto Government of Hugo Banzer Suarez; moreover, in the plan “priority has been given to the search for the mortal remains of Renato Ticona.” The State indicated that, under the 2010 Annual Plan of Operations, the project had been subdivided into three stages, which must be completed within a certain time frame and each of them has its own objectives. In addition, the State indicated that the objectives, activities and results of the project focus mainly on contributing to the reparation of human rights to strengthen democracy in Bolivia. It also described the results it hopes to obtain from the project, and advised that it had reinforced the “professional staff” by incorporating professionals, technicians, consultants and unskilled labor. Finally, it indicated that it had increased the CIEDEF budget. 31. In this regard, the representatives indicated that the State must increase its efforts to “comply with the provisions” of the said operative paragraph. Furthermore, in their observations of August 11, 2010, they asked that the State provide specific information to the Court on the budget allocated to CIEDEF and the date it began its functions. Subsequently, in their observations of December 17, 2010, the representatives indicated that none of the professionals allegedly hired by the State under the project “Contribution to the full exercise of human rights and the strengthening of democracy” had contacted Hugo Ticona or his next of kin, and the alleged priority given to the search would be difficult to maintain unless essential information was gathered from those directly involved. 9