51
allegedly inflicted on Alfredo José Peña Isaya, since at the moment of the events, he did not
go to a health center for a medical check-up, which is unsubstantial considering the time
that passed until he lodged a complaint.
179. The Court verifies that this fact was reported before the Attorney General’s Office134
and before the Ombudsman,135 as well as in the request for justification of June 2003136 and
before the Prosecutor Offices of Caracas Metropolitan Area.137 The proceedings conducted
were interviews with alleged victims in the capacity as witnesses.138 In turn, a transcript of
an interview was also furnished to the records of the case and in such interview Mr. Alfredo
José Peña Isaya described, in detail, the blows he would received,139 apart from other
rendering another statements.140
180. On August 10, 2006 more than four years and six months after the filing of the
complaint, the 50º Assistant Prosecutor requested the discontinuance of the case regarding
this fact, in relation to the alleged commission of the crime of intentional injuries, by virtue
of the extinguishment of the criminal action141. Four days after, the case file was allocated
on the 52º Investigating Trial Court of the District of Caracas Metropolitan Area, though
there is no proof of a decision on that request. Given that the State did not provide any
reason why the Investigating Judge has not rendered a decision regarding such requests,
the Court considers that the domestic authorities failed to comply with the duty to resolve
with due diligence and promptness (infra para. 344).
181. This Tribunal notes that the evidence furnished is consistent in that, in effect, Mr.
Peña Isaya was beaten by private individuals and therefore, Beatriz Adrián and Jorge Paz
were prevented from doing their job in that situation. Nevertheless, the testimonies coincide
134
Cf. Complaint lodged with the National Directorate of Common Crimes on January 31, 2002 (records of
evidence, volume IV, appendix 7 to the application, pages 931-963).
135
Cf. Complaint lodged with the Ombudsman on February 1, 2002 (records of evidence, volume IV,
appendix 9 to the application, pages 977-1023).
136
Cf. Request for justification of June 17, 2003, with the 20º Municipal Court of Caracas Metropolitan Area,
containing the declaration of Jorge Manuel Paz (records of evidence, volume IV, page 895).
137
Cf. Complaint lodged with the 2º Prosecutor’s Office of the Attorney General’s Office of the Judicial District
of Caracas Metropolitan Area on March 10, 2003 (records of evidence, volume IV, appendix 8 to the application,
pages 965-975).
138
Cf. transcript of Interview with Alfredo José Peña Isaya of February 19, 2002 before the 2º and 74º
Prosecutor Offices of Caracas Metropolitan Area (records of evidence, volume XXXII, pages 8377-8380); transcript
of interview with Beatriz Adrián Garcia of March 6, 2006 before the 50º Plenipotentiary Prosecutor Office (records
of evidence, volume XXXII, pages 8393-8394) and charter of complaints filed with the Attorney General's Office
prepared by the representatives (records of evidence, volume XIV, appendix 69 to the brief of pleadings, motions
and evidence, page 4008)
139
Mr. Peña Isaya pointed out, when being asked about whether he was injured in the incidents, that “yes,
since he ha[d ] a swelling in the left shoulder and a strong pain in the left leg where he received the kick; the other
blows were slight" and that the did not receive medical care for such injuries. Cf. Transcript of the interview of
February 19, 2002 with Alfredo José Peña Isaya before the 2º amd74º Prosecutor Offices of Caracas Metropolitan
Area (records of evidence, volume XXXII, pages 8377-8380).
140
Cf. Statement of Beatriz Adrián (records of evidence, volume X, appendix 50 to the brief of pleadings,
motion s and evidence, page 3060); transcript of interview of March 6, 2006 with Beatriz Adrián García before the
50º Plenipotentiary Prosecutor Office (records of evidence, volume XXXII, pages 8393- 8394).
141
Cf. Request for discontinuance of the 50º Plenipotentiary Assistant Prosecutor of the Attorney General's
Office of August 10, 2006 (records of evidence, volume XXXII, pages 8397-8404).
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents