9 (third operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); d) Publication in the official gazette of the operative paragraphs of the judgment on merits of August 18, 2000, (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); e) Organization of an act of public apology acknowledging the State’s responsibility for the violations of the human right of Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); and f) Annulment of any judicial or administrative, criminal or police record against Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides, in relation to the fact of this case and cancellation of the corresponding records (fifth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001). 7. That, having examined the information provided by the State, the Commission and the victim’s representatives in their briefs on compliance with the judgment on reparations, the Court considers it essential that the State of Peru provide the Court with information on: a) Payment of the interest accrued owing to the delays in the original payments (paragraph 97 of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); b) Publication in a national newspaper of the operative paragraphs of the judgment on merits of August 18, 2000, (seventh operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); c) The medical and psychological treatment being provided to Gladys Benavides López (eighth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); d) The measures needed to annul the verdict convicting Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides delivered by the Supreme Court of Justice of Peru (fourth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001); and e) The measures it has taken to award Luis Alberto Cantoral Benavides a grant for university studies in an establishment of acknowledged academic quality, chosen by mutual agreement between the State and the victim, which covers the costs of the university career of the latter’s election, and also maintenance expenses during the period of these studies (sixth operative paragraph of the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001). 8. That in the judgment of August 18, 2000, the Court decided: 12. […]that the State should order an investigation to determine the persons responsible for the human rights violations referred to in this judgment, and punish them. 9. That in the judgment on reparations of December 3, 2001, the Court decided: