-105iii. to pay the workers of the Municipality of Lima, members of the SITRAMUN that were dismissed, their future pensions; iv. to compensate “said persons for any other damage they may duly prove and that be a direct consequence of the alleged violations to human rights;” c) as regards non pecuniary damage, the Commission requested the Court to order Peru to compensate the workers of the Municipality of Lima, members of the SITRAMUN, that were dismissed “for other damage they may effectively prove and that be a direct consequence of the alleged violations to the human rights of the victims, including the non-pecuniary damage for the suffering caused by the reduction in the amount of their pensions and for the non-compliance by the State with the judgments of the Peruvian courts;” d) the Commission requested the Court to order the State to proceed to “the physical and legal transfer of the premises to be used as SITRAMUN headquarters, for the benefit of its members”; and to “register the La Molina plots of land, the elapsing and recording cancellation of which was ordered by the Municipality of Lima;” and e) as regards costs and expenses, the Commission requested the Court to order the State to pay the costs originated both at the domestic and the international levels during the processing of the case before the Commission, as well as those originating during the processing of the case before the Court. 292. Arguments by the common intervener for the representatives a) the beneficiaries of the reparations are the 1,734 workers of the Municipality of Lima listed in the application. Besides, 39 workers of said Municipality, members of the SITRAMUN, and 274 workers of the Empresa de Servicios Municipales de Limpieza de Lima (ESMLL) (Lima Municipal Cleaning Services Corporation) (ESMILL) mentioned in the judgment by the Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court) of June 8, 1998, together with 10 persons mistakenly excluded, should also be taken into account as victims and beneficiaries of the reparations that were not included in the complaint filed by the Commission; b) as regards pecuniary damage, the common intervener requested the Court to order Peru: i. to reinstate “the SITRAMUN–Lima workers that were unfairly dismissed by the Municipality of Lima, to the same jobs they had before the dismissal or to positions of similar level and pay;” ii. to pay the wages and salaries, bonuses, allowances, and other labor benefits corresponding to workers under the Collective Agreements, as ordered in the judgment of November 18, 1998, rendered on the Record of Case No. 261-97; iii. to grant those workers that cannot be reinstated to their jobs by reason of their physical or mental disability, the disability pension available to them according to law, in addition to the corresponding compensations for damages;