9. The alleged violation of Article 7(3), 7(4) and 7(6) of the American Convention on Human Rights was not demonstrated, for the reasons stated in paragraphs 155, 157 and 158 of this Judgment. AND ORDERS, Unanimously that: 1. This Judgment constitutes per se a form of reparation. 2. The State shall conduct an effective investigation into the facts of this case, in order to investigate them, determine the corresponding criminal responsibilities and effectively apply the sanctions and consequences contemplated by law, under the terms of paragraphs 248 to 250 of this Judgment. 3. The State shall provide medical and psychological care, free of charge and in an immediate, appropriate and effective manner, to those victims who request it, under the terms of paragraphs 253 and 254 of this Judgment. 4. The State shall issue the publications indicated in paragraph 256 of this Judgment. 5. The State shall pay the amounts stipulated in paragraphs 278, 279, 281, 285 and 287 of this Judgment, as compensation for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damages, for reimbursement of costs and expenses, and for the reimbursement of the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund, under the terms of those paragraphs and of paragraphs 288 to 290 of this Judgment. 6. The Court, in exercise of its authority and, in compliance with its duties under to the American Convention on Human Rights, shall monitor full compliance with this Judgment and shall consider this case concluded once the State has fully complied with the measures ordered in this Judgment. Within the term of one year as of notification of this Judgment, the State shall submit a report to this Court concerning the measures adopted in compliance with this Judgment. Judge Vio Grossi informed the Court of his Concurrent Opinion, which is attached to this Judgment. Done in Spanish and English, the Spanish text being authentic, in San Jose, Costa Rica, on September 3, 2012. 73