CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Diego García Sayán President Manuel Ventura Robles Leonardo A. Franco Rhadys Abreu Blondet Alberto Pérez Pérez Eduardo Vio Grossi Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Diego García Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 74

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
16Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

IPURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE4
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 5
III JURISDICTION7
IV EVIDENCE7
A. -Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence8
B. -Admission of documentary evidence8
C. -Admission of the statements of the alleged victims and of the testimonial and expert evidence9
D. -Assessment of the file on provisional measures 9
V FACTS10
A. -Context10
B. -The death of Néstor José Uzcátegui13
B.1.Undisputed facts 13
B.2.Disputed facts13
C. -The investigation into the death of Néstor José Uzcátegui15
D. -The arrest of Luisand Carlos Eduardo Uzcátegui22
E. -Alleged threats and harassment against Luis Enrique Uzcáteg22
F. -Investigations into the alleged threats, harassment and arrests to the detriment of Luis and Carlos Eduardo Uzcátegui25
G. -Criminal proceeding for slander against Luis Enrique Uzcáteg30
VI MERITS31
VI.1 DEPRIVATION OF THE LIFE OF NÉSTOR JOSÉ UZCÁTEGUI (RIGHT TO LIFE)31
A. -Arguments31
B. -Considerations of the Court31
VI.2 THE ARREST OF LUIS AND CARLOS UZCÁTEGUI ON JANUARY 1, 2001. (RIGHTS TO PERSONAL LIBERTY AND RIGHTS OF THE CHILD)36
A. -Arguments36
B. -Considerations ofthe Court37
VI.3 RIGHT TO HUMANE TREATMENT [PERSONAL INTEGRITY] AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION40
A. -Arguments.41
A.1.Alleged violation of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] of Néstor José Uzcátegui41
A.2.Alleged violation of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] for the treatment of Luis and Carlos Eduardo Uzcátegui when they were arrested 41
A.3.Alleged violation of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] for the threats and harassment suffered by Luis Enrique Uzcátegui41
A.4. Alleged violation of the freedom of expression of Luis Enrique Uzcátegui 42
A.5. Alleged violation of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] of the relatives of Néstor and Luis Enrique Uzcátegu43
A.6.Alleged violation of he right to humane treatment [personal integrity] of Carlos Uzcátegui in relation to the State’s special obligation to protect him given his status as a minor44
B. Considerations of the Court44
B.1.Alleged violation of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] of Néstor José Uzcátegui45
B.2.Alleged violations of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] and freedom of expression to the detriment of Luis Enrique Uzcátegui.45
B.3.Alleged violation of the right to humane treatment [personal integrity] of the relatives of Néstor and Luis Enrique Uzcátegu48
VI.4 RIGHTS TO PRIVACY AND PRIVATE PROPERTY 49
A. -Arguments31
B.-Considerations of the Court49
B.1. Right to privacy 50
B.2. Right to private property 51
VI.5 RIGHT TO AFAIR TRIAL [JUDICIAL GUARANTEES] AND JUDICIAL PROTECTION52
A. -Arguments31
B.-Considerations of the Court54
B.1. Investigation and process related to the execution of Néstor José Uzcátegui54
a.-Investigation procedures 54
b.-Reasonable period57
B.2. Investigations and legal proceedings related to the events of January 25, 2003.58
B.3. Investigations into the detention, threats and harassment against Luis andCarlos Eduardo Uzcátegui.59
VII REPARATIONS (APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 63(1)OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)60
A.-Injured party60
B. -Obligation to investigate the facts 61
C. -Measures of rehabilitation, satisfaction and guarantees of non-repetition62
C.1. Rehabilitation Measures62
C.2. Measures of Satisfaction63
a. -Publication of the Judgmen63
b. -Other requests63
C.3. Guarantees of non-repetition.64
D.-Compensation67
D.1. Pecuniary damages 67
D.2. Non-pecuniary damages 68
E.-Costs and Expenses 70
F.-Reimbursement of expenses to the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund 71
G.-Method of compliance with the payments ordered71
VIII OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS 71
INDIVIDUAL CONCURRING OPINIONOF JUDGE EDUARDO VIO GROSSI,75

Uzcátegui et al. Judgment. September 3, 2012

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Merits
Reparations

Date: Sep 3, 2012

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C-249

Country

Venezuela

Signatories

Alberto Pérez Pérez
Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Leonardo A. Franco
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Separate vote

Eduardo Vio Grossi

Primary Documents

Uzcátegui et al. Merits and Reparations. Judgment. September 3, 2012.pdf
English
Download View
Uzcátegui y otros. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 3 de septiembre de 2012.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Uzcátegui et al. Merits and Reparations. Judgment. September 3, 2012.doc555.52 kB

Uzcátegui y otros. Fondo y Reparaciones. Sentencia de 3 de septiembre de 2012.doc576 kB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

Signatories5
- Judge and/or Commissioners5
País1
- Country1
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
IACourt Documents7
- Order of the IACourt4
- Order of the President IACHR2
- Hearing1
No Label1
- Case1
Separate Votes1
- Separate vote1

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.