6 existence of a violation. This review is a summary analysis that does not involve any prejudgment nor is it a preview of the opinion on the merits of the case. 30. The IACHR finds that, should it be proven that Mr. Héctor Fidel Cordero was dismissed as a result of decisions made by him in the course of the performance of his duties as a judge, that the alleged imposition of an inaccurate and harsher disciplinary sanction than the one that was in force at the time of the alleged acts is true, that Decision No. 088-96PCNM is indeed incompatible with the guarantee of judicial independence as alleged, and that there was no effective judicial response by the bodies that heard the amparo claim lodged on September 6, 1996, as claimed, this could tend to establish a violation of the rights enshrined in Articles 9, 8 and 25 of the American Convention, in connection with the general obligations set forth in Articles 1.1 and 2 of the same instrument. 31. The IACHR clarifies that the petitioner did not allege the violation of specific provisions of the Convention and, therefore, the articles listed in the previous paragraph were incorporated by virtue of the principle of jura novit curia. 32. Lastly, the Commission finds that the requirements provided under articles 47(b) and c) of the American Convention have been met, inasmuch as it is not evident that the claims brought by the petitioner are groundless and out of order. V. CONCLUSIONS 33. Based on the considerations of fact and of law set forth herein, and without prejudice to the merits of the matter, the Inter-American Commission finds that the instant case meets the requirements of admissibility set forth in Articles 46 and 47 of the American Convention and, consequently, THE INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DECIDES: 1. To find the petition under consideration admissible, with regard to the rights enshrined in Articles 9, 8 and 25 of the American Convention, in connection with the obligations set forth in Articles 1.1 and 2 of the same instrument. 2. Notify the State and the petitioners of this decision. 3. Proceed to examine the merits of the matter. 4. Publish this decision and include it in the Annual Report to be submitted at the OAS General Assembly. Done and signed in the city of Washington, D.C., on the 22nd day of July 2011. (Signed): Dinah Shelton, President; José de Jesús Orozco Henríquez, First Vice-President; Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, Felipe González, and María Silvia Guillén, Commission Members.