8 Pasu, Aldemar Escué Zapata, Yonson Escué Zapata, Ayénder Escué Zapata, Omar Zapata and Albeiro Pasu (operative paragraph twelve of the Judgment), the Court received information from the State, the victim's representatives and the InterAmerican Commission, within the framework of the private hearing on monitoring compliance that was jointly held with other cases (supra Having Seen clause 9). 27. The Tribunal shall decide, in time fashion, on all the information received so far and on the information that the parties offered to forward to the Court at said hearing on the procedure to monitor compliance. * * * 28. As to the obligation to publish the Judgment in the official gazette and in another newspaper with national circulation (operative paragraph thirteen of the Judgment) the State informed that, after the meeting held with the victim's nextof-kin and their representatives, they agreed on "the publication of a text different to the one ordered [...] in [the] Judgment, in an additional offspring and with pictures. The foregoing, in order to facilitate the reading and access of the society in general”. This publication “was made on September 14, 2008, in the Sunday edition of El Tiempo newspaper”12. Likewise, as to the publication translated in Nasa Yuwe language, the State pointed out that “it hired two linguists […] who translated the Judgment into the indigenous language, which was published on December 14 in 'El Liberal' [local] newspaper”13. Therefore, it requested the Court to consider this measure to be partially complied with, in view of the fact that the publication in the Official Gazette is still pending. 29. The representatives noted that “[t]he publication of the summary of the [J]udgment, the text of which was agreed on between the parties, was made in Spanish in a newspaper with widespread national circulation and in the original language of the Nasa people, in a newspaper with regional circulation”. They further alleged that “[d]espite this and going back to the information furnished in the State’s report, the publication of the [J]udgment in the Official Gazette is still pending”. 30. The Commission “positively valu[ed] the information presented regarding the publication of the Judgment” and pointed out that “it hopes that the State proceeds with the publication of the pertinent parts of the Judgment in the official gazette". 31. The Court values the steps taken by the State in order to publish the pertinent parts of the Judgment, especially in relation to the agreement reached between the State and the representatives in that regard. In the Tribunal's opinion, the publication is a great progress, considering not only the Spanish publication made in the newspaper with national circulation and the Nasa Yuwe publication made in the regional newspaper, but also the summary of the Judgment that, after have been drafted without using legal terms, it is more accessible and easy-reading material for the population in general, reaching the efficiency desired of such measure. The Court highlights the importance of publishing the Judgment in the language of the Nasa people, since it brought the work of international bodies closer to the indigenous people and showed the repairing and symbolic effect of such measure within the community. As a result, 12 See, original Offspring “Compliance with Judgment of Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Case of Germán Escué Zapata”. “El Tiempo” Newspaper, September 14, 2008 (records on monitoring compliance, Volume I, pages 73 to 76). 13 See, Original copy of the publication of ‘El Liberal’ newspaper of December 21, 2008, page 2A, in which it was published the text in Nasa Yuwe, translated by Fernando Uino Cuetia and Maximiliano Pilcue (records on monitoring compliance, Volume I, pages 77 and 78).