4 10. On May 4, 2000, the State commented on the briefs on reparations submitted by the victim and the Inter-American Commission. 11. On June 12, 2000, the President summoned Mr. Cesti or his legal representative, the Inter-American Commission and Peru to a pubic hearing on reparations to be held at the seat of the Court on August 10, 2000. 12. On June 20, 2000, Mr. Cesti commented on the brief on reparations submitted by the State. 13. On August 10, 2000, the Court held a public hearing on reparations. There appeared before the Court: Gustavo Adolfo Cesti Hurtado; for the Inter-American Commission: Oscar Luján Fappiano Alberto Borea Odría, and Christina M. Cerna; for the State: Jorge Hawie Soret, and Rolando Eyzaguirre. 14. On September 11, 2000, the victim submitted written comments on the arguments made by the State during the public hearing on reparations. 15. On November 6, 2000, the State informed the Court that “the Supreme Council of Military Justice ha[d] complied with the decisions of the judgment [on merits]” and attached a copy of the decision of the Plenary of the Supreme Council of Military Justice of September 14, 2000, which established that “the orders issued against [Mr. Cesti] that restricted his freedom and embargoed his property are suspended.” 16. On February 9, 2001, the State informed the Court that it had appointed Patricio Marcial Rubio Correa and Iván Arturo Bazán Chacón as its agent and deputy agent, respectively, in this case, and on February 16 that year, it indicated the place where any notifications would be officially received. 17. On April 26, 2001, the victim submitted a brief with observations on the reparations in the instant case and attached certain documentary evidence in six annexes (infra 27 and 29). IV EVIDENCE 18. Article 43 of the Rules of Procedure of the Inter-American Court (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”) establishes that: