ORDER OF THE
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
OF AUGUST 22, 2013
VICTIMS’ LEGAL ASSISTANCE FUND
CASE OF FORNERÓN AND DAUGHTER V. ARGENTINA

HAVING SEEN:
1.
The judgment on merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”)
delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American
Court” or “the Court”) on April 27, 2012, in which it decided, inter alia, that:
7.
The State must […] reimburse the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund the amount
established in paragraph 210 of [the said] Judgment.

2.
The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of June 1,
2012, in which, pursuant to Article 67(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, the
Argentine Republic (hereinafter “the State” or “Argentina”) was notified of the Judgment
(supra having seen paragraph 1).
3.
The communication of August 24, 2012, in which the State asked the Court to
provide the information required to make the corresponding reimbursement to the Victims’
Legal Assistance Fund of the Court (hereinafter “the Legal Assistance Fund” or “the
Assistance Fund of the Court”).
4.
The note of August 30, 2012, in which the Secretariat provided the State with the
information needed to make the reimbursement to the Legal Assistance Fund.
5.
The notes of February 4, May 7 and June 4, 2013, in which, on the instruction of the
President of the Court, the State was reminded that, according to paragraph 210 of the
Judgment (supra having seen paragraph 1), it must reimburse the Legal Assistance Fund
the sum of US$9,046.35 (nine thousand and forty-six United States dollars and thirty-five
cents). In addition, the State was informed that, as indicated in paragraph 210, the State
should have reimbursed the said amount within 90 days of notification of the Judgment, a
time frame that had expired on August 30, 2012.
6.
The brief of July 5, 2013, in which the State presented the annual report required in
the eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment, in which it referred to the “pecuniary
aspects of [the said] Judgment.”
CONSIDERING THAT:
1.
One of the jurisdictional functions of the Court is to monitor compliance with its
decisions.

Select target paragraph3