ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF AUGUST 22, 2013 VICTIMS’ LEGAL ASSISTANCE FUND CASE OF FORNERÓN AND DAUGHTER V. ARGENTINA HAVING SEEN: 1. The judgment on merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the Judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) on April 27, 2012, in which it decided, inter alia, that: 7. The State must […] reimburse the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund the amount established in paragraph 210 of [the said] Judgment. 2. The note of the Secretariat of the Court (hereinafter “the Secretariat”) of June 1, 2012, in which, pursuant to Article 67(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court, the Argentine Republic (hereinafter “the State” or “Argentina”) was notified of the Judgment (supra having seen paragraph 1). 3. The communication of August 24, 2012, in which the State asked the Court to provide the information required to make the corresponding reimbursement to the Victims’ Legal Assistance Fund of the Court (hereinafter “the Legal Assistance Fund” or “the Assistance Fund of the Court”). 4. The note of August 30, 2012, in which the Secretariat provided the State with the information needed to make the reimbursement to the Legal Assistance Fund. 5. The notes of February 4, May 7 and June 4, 2013, in which, on the instruction of the President of the Court, the State was reminded that, according to paragraph 210 of the Judgment (supra having seen paragraph 1), it must reimburse the Legal Assistance Fund the sum of US$9,046.35 (nine thousand and forty-six United States dollars and thirty-five cents). In addition, the State was informed that, as indicated in paragraph 210, the State should have reimbursed the said amount within 90 days of notification of the Judgment, a time frame that had expired on August 30, 2012. 6. The brief of July 5, 2013, in which the State presented the annual report required in the eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment, in which it referred to the “pecuniary aspects of [the said] Judgment.” CONSIDERING THAT: 1. One of the jurisdictional functions of the Court is to monitor compliance with its decisions.