ORDER OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS OF FEBRUARY 22, 2011 CASE OF BAENA RICARDO ET AL V. PANAMA MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT HAVING SEEN: 1. The judgment on the merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter “the judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the InterAmerican Court” or “the Court”) on February 2, 2001. 2. The orders on monitoring compliance with judgment issued by the InterAmerican Court on June 21, 2002, November 22, 2002, June 6, 2003, November 28, 2005, October 30, 2008, July 1, 2009, and May 28, 2010. In the latter, the Court declared: 1. That, pursuant to the thirteenth and fourteen considering paragraphs of th[e] Order, the State has complied with the delivery the cheques corresponding to the second of the four agreed payments with regard to 262 victims or heirs of the 266 persons who signed the agreements, and with the forwarding of the corresponding receipts (operative paragraphs 1 and 4(a) of the Order of October 30, 2008). 2. That, in accordance with sixteenth considering paragraph of th[e] Order, the State has still to comply with its obligation to make an individualized bank deposit and send the corresponding receipts, with regard to those persons who have not signed the agreements or who, having signed them, withdrew their consent (operative paragraphs 3 and 4(b) of the Order of October 30, 2008). AND DECIDE[D]: 1. To require the State of Panama to continue adopting all necessary measures to comply effectively and promptly with the pending payments established in the agreements with regard to the victims or heirs who have signed them. 2. To require the State of Panama to adopt al necessary measures to comply effectively and promptly with the bank deposits corresponding to the victims or heirs who did not sign the agreements or who withdrew their consent, as established in the agreements approved by the Court and in the Order of October 30, 2008. 3. To reiterate, with regard to the victims or heirs who did not sign the agreements or who withdrew their consent, that any discrepancy regarding the determination of all the rights arising from the judgment and the amounts of the compensation and reimbursements relating to compliance with the sixth and seventh operative paragraphs of the judgment must be decided in the domestic sphere under the applicable domestic procedures, which includes the possibility of resorting to the domestic authorities such as the domestic courts. 4. To reiterate that the Court will keep the proceeding of monitoring compliance with judgment open with the sole purpose of receiving: (a) the receipts for payment to the victims or heirs who signed the agreements, and (b) the receipts for the bank deposits with regard to