5 impunity as of the present time. According to the application, one of the alleged victims of the case was Wilmer José Florez Barrios. A) On the alleged "extrajudicial execution" of Wilmer José Flores Barrios and the steps that the State has taken in regard to it 7. The Commission reported that "Wilmer José Florez Barrios, beneficiary of the provisional measures in question, [was murdered on September 1, 2010] by two individuals who intercepted him and shot him at least twice." It also reiterated “what has been indicated on multiple occasions with regard to the lack of compliance with provisional measures on the part of the State" and that "although the information on the circumstances of the death of Wilmer José Flores Barrios is incipient[,...] the State has not taken any protective action." He added that Wilmer José is the sixth member of the Barrios family to be murdered in the third murdered with the provisional measures in force. Finally, it asked the Court to order the State to provide a report and, given the gravity of situation, consider the possibility of calling a public hearing on the measures. Later, on October 18, 2010, the Commission submitted additional information and recalled that "in its report on the merits 11/10 it found that young Flores Barrios was the victim of a series of violations of his human rights” and found "that his murder in the context of the lack of protection faced by the family constitutes a supervening fact that should be evaluated by the Court upon issuing a judgment in the case." 8. The representatives also reported that on September 1, 2010, Wilmer José Flores Barrios, son of Martiza Barrios and brother of Rigoberto and Caudy Barrios, “lost his life violently upon being attacked [allegedly] at 3:30 in the afternoon by two individuals who have not been identified.” He was only 19 years old and had been a beneficiary of the provisional measures since 2005. The alleged execution of another member of the Barrios family raises to six the number of dead family members allegedly executed by police officers. The State has not investigated nor has it diligently processed those responsible for the facts committed against the various members of the family. The situation is even worse taking into account that one of the deaths, that of Luis Alberto Barrios in September of 2004, took place while he was protected by precautionary measures granted by the Commission, while three of the deaths - those of Rigoberto Barrios in January 2005, Oscar Barrios in November of 2009, as well as this one - took place while the victims were covered by provisional measures granted by the Court. According to the representatives, this demonstrates the State’s grave failure to comply and lack of effectiveness in the adoption of the measures ordered by the bodies of the inter-American human rights protection system. 9. According to statements from the family members, the representatives indicated that Wilmer José Flores Barrios was traveling toward the national highway when he was intercepted near the Guayabito River, located at the entrance to the village of Guanayen, by two men dressed as civilians and with their faces covered. They emerge from the underbrush where they had been hiding. Upon intercepting him, they forced him to dismount the motorcycle he was riding, they ordered him to get on his knees, and they immediately fired two shots, one in his back and the other in his neck. Upon hearing the shots, Caudy Barrios went running towards the place and saw the attackers fleeing into the underbrush. Later, Wilmer José was transported to the Camatagua hospital where he was admitted with no vital signs. At the time the facts took place, a police unit from Guarico state was passing by, but the police officers refused to transport Wilmer José and did not pursue the attackers. However, they escorted the vehicle transporting the victim from the place of the incidents to the hospital and remained there until his death was confirmed. Based on the facts, the representatives asked the Court to: a) maintain

Select target paragraph3