8 C) Considerations regarding the death of the beneficiaries of the provisional measures and the acts of harassment and intimidation and other situations that put at risk the life and personal integrity of the beneficiaries 17. This Tribunal finds that the deaths of Rigoberto Barrios, which took place on January 19, 2005; Oscar Barrios, which took place on November 28, 2009; and the recent death of Wilmer José Flores Barrios, which took place on September 1, 2010; have caused the irreparable damage that the provisional measures sought to prevent, for which reason they represent a grave failure on the part of the State to comply with the provisions of Article 63(2) of the American Convention. That situation demonstrates the ineffectiveness of the measures put in place by the State to eliminate the source of risk and adequately protect the beneficiaries of these provisional measures. 18. Additionally, according to information provided by the parties, the members of the Barrios family continue to be subjected to harassment, intimidation, and other situations that put their lives and personal integrity at risk. Consequently, this Court finds that a situation of extreme gravity and urgency prevails that puts the lives and personal integrity of the beneficiaries of these measures in grave risk. 19. Given the gravity of the situation facing the members of the Barrios family, it is necessary to reiterate the requirement that the State immediately and effectively take all necessary and special measures to ensure the full exercise of the rights to life and humane treatment of the beneficiaries of these measures, such that the measures be effective at preventing the threats and harassment and causing them to cease, as well as so the beneficiaries can live their lives in the way in which they are accustomed and without fear. 20. Considering the foregoing, the Court deems it crucial for the State and the representatives to submit to the Tribunal, within the time period established in the operative paragraphs of this order, specific and detailed information on the situation of the beneficiaries of these provisional measures, to wit: Eloisa Barrios, Inés Barrios, Beatriz Barrios, Orismar Carolina Alzul García, Pablo Solórzano, Caudy Barrios, Jorge Barrios, Juan Barrios, Maritza Barrios, Roni Barrios, Roniex Barrios, Luis Alberto Barrios, Yelitza Lugo Pelaes, Arianna Nazaret Barrios, Oriana Zabaret Barrios, Víctor Cabrera Barrios, Beatriz Cabrera Barrios, Luimari Guzmán Barrios, Luiseydi Guzmán Barrios, Génesis Andreina Barrios, Víctor Tomas Barrios, Geilin Alexandra Barrios, Elvira Barrios, Darelvis Barrios, Elvis Sarais Barrios, Cirilo Robert Barrios and Lorena Barrios. That information shall contain an evaluation of the situations of risk. It also must define specific, adequate and sufficient protective measures. Toward doing so, the beneficiaries and their representatives shall offer their complete cooperation to the State and facilitate the carrying out of the evaluation. D) Submission of information 21. The Court notes that not only has the State not complied with the provisional measures ordered by this Tribunal, but neither has it duly reported on their implementation. In this regard, the State did not respond in a timely fashion to the request for information indicated in operative paragraphs four, five, and six of the order of the Court dated February 4, 2010, a request that was reiterated by this Tribunal on June 28 and September 28, 2010, with regard to: a) the measures on guarding the homes of Maritza Barrios, Juan Barrios, and Orismar Carolina Alzul García; b) the conditions that would allow the family members who have been forced to move to other