10 50. That the Commission indicated that it noted positively the information provided by the State. 51. That the Court considers that the State has complied partially with this aspect, as regards the publication in the official gazette. The Court awaits information regarding the publication in the national newspaper. It take into account the agreement reached by the State and the representatives concerning the radio broadcast of the pertinent parts of the Judgment, and reminds the State that, according to the Order of February 2, 2007, it must provide the Court with the respective written records of the radio station used, the timetable and the number of broadcasts, and the language used. Also, the State must forward a recording of one of the broadcasts, a transcription of this broadcast and, should it have been carried out in any language other than Spanish, a translation of the transcript. * * * 52. That the representatives stated “that there is a lack of coordination among the State’s institutions to comply fully with the Judgment.” 53. That, during the public hearing, the State indicated that it undertook “to form a commission […] by means of a presidential decree so as be able to implement public policies […], especially in the indigenous regions.” 54. That the Court observes positively the State’s offer to appoint a commission. The Court also recalls that the treaty obligation of the States Parties to comply promptly with the Court’s rulings is binding on all the State’s powers and organs.14 THEREFORE: THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS, in exercise of its authority to monitor compliance with its decisions and in accordance with Articles 33, 62(1), 62(3), 65, 67 and 68(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, 25(1) and 30 of its Statute, and 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, DECLARES: 1. That as indicated in Considering paragraphs 36 to 39 of this Order, the State has complied fully with the tenth operative paragraph of the Judgment on merits, reparations and costs. 2. That, as indicated in Considering paragraphs 21, 43 and 51 of this Order, the State has complied partially with the following operative paragraphs: (a) Partial payment of the compensation and reimbursement of costs and expenses (eighth operative paragraph of the Judgment); 14 Cf. Baena Ricardo et al. v. Panama. Competence, supra note 2, para. 60; Gómez Palomino v. Peru. Compliance with judgment, supra note 4, seventh considering paragraph, and García Asto and Ramírez Rojas v. Peru. Compliance with judgment, supra note 2, sixth considering paragraph.