CEJIL

- Library
- Sign in

Done, at Bridgetown, Barbados, on October 13, 2011, in the Spanish and English languages, the Spanish version being authentic. Diego García-Sayán President Manuel E. Ventura Robles Margarette May Macaulay Rhadys Abreu Blondet Eduardo Vio Grossi Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary So ordered, Diego García-Sayán President Pablo Saavedra Alessandri Secretary 96

Select target paragraph3

● ● ●

Uwazi is developed by
CEJIL
Library
Login

Info
17Relationships

Search Tips

Search text

Type something in the search box to get some results.

I INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE AND PURPOSE OF THE DISPUTE 3
II PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT 4
III COMPETENCE 6
IV EVIDENCE 6
A. Documentary, testimonial and expert evidence 6
B. Admission of the evidence 8
B.1 Admission of the documentary evidence 8
B.2. Admission of the testimonial and expert evidence10
V PRIOR CONSIDERATIONS11
A.Regarding the facts that are the subject of this case 11
B.Regarding the determination of the alleged victims 14
C. Regarding the alleged “failure to exhaust domestic remedies” 17
VI RIGHTS TO JUDICIAL GUARANTEES, JUDICIAL PROTECTION, AND EQUAL PROTECTION, IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO RESPECT AND GUARANTEE RIGHTS 19
A. Proven facts in relation to the alleged violations of the guarantees of due process and judicial protection 19
A.1. Context of the banking crisis in Uruguay 19
A.2. Facts related to the Banco de Montevideo, the procedure under article 31 of Law No. 17,613, and the alleged victims in this case 21
B. RIGHT TO BE HEARD AND GUARANTEES OF DUE PROCESS OF LAW 51
B.1) Material aspect of the right to be heard in the procedure before the administrative body (the Central Bank) 54
B.2. Due procedural guarantees before the Central Bank and the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal2
B.2.a) Alleged “presumption of consent” by application of “disqualifying criteria” Arguments of the parties 62
B.2.b) Alleged new criteria applied arbitrarily by the Advisory Commission to the benefit of 22 cases 67
B.2.c) Procedural guarantee of adequate reasoning 70
B.2.d) Alleged lack of information concerning evidence Arguments of the parties 74
C) JUDICIAL PROTECTION76
C.1) The appeal for annulment before the Contentious-Administrative Tribunal 76
C.2) Other alleged judicial remedies available 84
D. Conclusions of the Court concerning Chapter VI 86
VII RIGHT TO PROPERTY IN RELATION TO THE OBLIGATION TO GUARANTEE RIGHTS 86
Arguments of the parties 86
Considerations of the Court87
VIII REPARATIONS (APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 63(1) OF THE AMERICAN CONVENTION)88
A. Injured Party88
B. Measures of reparation 2
B.1) Measure of satisfaction and guarantee of non-repetition 89
B.1.a) Guarantee of due process and judicial protection in the determination of the rights of the victims 89
B.1.b) Publication and dissemination of the judgment2
B.2. Compensation for non-pecuniary damage91
B.3. Other claims for reparation92
B.4. Costs and expenses92
C. Means of compliance with the payments ordered 2
IX OPERATIVE PARAGRAPHS94
ANNEX WITH REGARD TO THE VICTIMS 2
# DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE EDUARDO VIO GROSSI 137
# CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE DIEGO GARCIA-SAYÁN 154
# CONCURRENT OPINION JUDGE MARGARETTE MAY MACAULAY 159
# CONCURRING OPINION OF JUDGE RHADYS ABREU BLONDET 160

Barbani Duarte et al. Judgment. October 13, 2011

IACourt judgment

Preview

Type

Costs
Merits
Reparations

Date: Oct 13, 2011

Mechanism

Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos

Number: C-234

Country

Uruguay

Signatories

Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Manuel E. Ventura Robles
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Separate vote

Diego García-Sayán
Eduardo Vio Grossi
Margarette May Macaulay
Rhadys Abreu Blondet

Primary Documents

Barbani Duarte et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. October 13, 2011.pdf
English
Download View
Barbani Duarte y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 13 de octubre de 2011.pdf
Spanish
Download View

Supporting files

Barbani Duarte et al. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment. October 13, 2011.doc1.47 MB

Barbani Duarte y otros. Fondo, Reparaciones y Costas. Sentencia de 13 de octubre de 2011.doc1.45 MB

No References

References are parts of this document related with other documents and entities.

País1
- Country1
Signatories4
- Judge and/or Commissioners4
Signatory Separate Vote3
- Judge and/or Commissioners3
Mecanismo1
- Mechanism1
No Label1
- Case1
IACourt Documents3
- Order of the President IACHR1
- IACourt judgment1
- Order of the IACourt1
Separate Votes4
- Separate vote4

Create Reference

Select relationship type

Relacionado a
CorteIDH
CIDH
Votos separados
Paises
Jueces intervinientes
País
Multi Select
Mecanismo
Firmantes
Sexo
Tipo
Firmante Voto separado
Estado
Descriptores
Geolocalización de los hechos del caso
Medidas de Protección

Search Tips

Connect to a paragraph

Connect to an entity

Disable highlights

Add to table of contents

Notifications

You're all caught up

New activity will show up here.