6 However, in this case, there is no fact or relevant situation unknown when the judgment was issued that, if known, would have modified its result, but instead the State is questioning the Court’s jurisdiction to order certain reparation measures allegedly contrary to domestic law and allegedly contrary to the general principles of law. Due to the aforementioned, the requirements necessary for the Court to revise its judgment are not met. VIII Operative Paragraphs 22. Therefore, The Inter-American Court of Human Rights pursuant to Article 67 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Articles 29(3) and 59 of the Rules of Procedure, Decides: Unanimously, 1. To declare inadmissible the request for interpretation of the Judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations, and costs issued on November 21, 2007 in the terms of paragraphs 20 y 21 of this judgment. 2. To request the Secretariat of the Tribunal to notify the present Judgment to the representatives of the victims, the State of Ecuador, and the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights. Done in Spanish and English, the Spanish text being authentic, in San José, Costa Rica, on November 26, 2008. Sergio García Ramírez President Cecilia Medina Quiroga Diego García-Sayán Manuel E. Ventura Robles Leonardo A. Franco