ORDER OF THE
INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS
OF DECEMBER 1, 2011
CASE OF RADILLA PACHECO v. UNITED MEXICAN STATES
MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH JUDGMENT
HAVING SEEN:
1.
The judgment on preliminary objections, merits, reparations and costs (hereinafter
“the judgment”) delivered by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the
Inter-American Court” or “the Court”) on November 23, 2009.
2.
The order on monitoring compliance with judgment issued by the Court on May 19,
2011, in which it declared, inter alia, that the following obligation remained pending:
[…]
f)
To hold a public act of acknowledgement of responsibility with regard to the facts of the
present case and in order to restore the memory of Rosendo Radilla Pacheco, and to place a plaque
recalling the facts of his forced disappearance in Atoyac de Álvarez (Guerrero) (fourteenth operative
paragraph of the judgment […]);
[…]

3.
The communications of July 14 and August 29, 2011, in which the United Mexican
States (hereinafter “the State” or “Mexico”) presented information on compliance with the
judgment delivered by the Court in this case (supra having seen paragraph 1). Also, the
communications of November 16, 18 and 29, 2011, in which the State presented
information on the public act of acknowledgement of responsibility and the unveiling of a
plaque recalling the forced disappearance of Rosendo Radilla Pacheco (supra having seen
paragraphs 1 and 2).
4.
The brief of October 17, 2011, in which the representatives of the victims
(hereinafter “the representatives”) presented their observations on the State’s
communications of July 14 and August 29, 2011 (supra having seen paragraph 3). Also, the
briefs of November 10, 18 and 29, 2011, in which the representatives referred to the public
act of acknowledgement of responsibility and the unveiling of a memorial plaque in this case
(supra having seen paragraph 3).
5.
The communication of November 8, 2011, in which the Inter-American Commission
on Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Commission” or “the Commission”)
presented its observations on the State’s report of August 29, 2011 (supra having seen
paragraph 3). In addition, the communication of November 29, 2011, in which the
Commission presented its observations on the information forwarded by the State and the
representatives on the public act of acknowledgement of responsibility and the unveiling of
a memorial plaque (supra having seen paragraphs 3 and 4).

Select target paragraph3