-3- [CONSIDERED]: 4. That the provisional measures were ordered in a case submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court as regards the merits, reparations and costs, with the purpose of protecting the rights to life and humane treatment of Fermín Ramírez, who was sentenced to the death penalty and whose execution was imminent. Said measures would also prevent, inter alia, any reparation ordered by the Court in favor of the alleged victim from rendering ineffective. […] 6. That in delivering said Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs, the Court ordered, inter alia, that "the State must abstain from executing Mr. Fermín Ramírez, whichever the result of the [new] trial referred to in Operative Paragraph seven" of said Judgment. Therefore, the obligation to respect the rights to life and humane treatment of Fermín Ramírez, initially imposed by means of the order of provisional measures, stems from the set of reparations ordered in the Judgment, which must be complied with from the date it is served upon the State. Thus, the State’s obligations deriving from the provisional measures shall be superseded by the provisions of the above-mentioned Judgment and, consequently, their fulfillment and compliance shall not be regarded in connection with the provisional measures but with the monitoring of compliance with the Judgment. [AND RULED:] To rescind the provisional measures ordered by the Inter-American Court of 1. Human Rights in favor of Fermín Ramírez by Order of March 12, 2005, for the obligations of the State derived from the provisional measures were superseded by the provisions of the Judgment on the merits, reparations and costs delivered by the Court on June 20, 2005 […] 4. The brief of November 17, 2005, whereby the State submitted information relative to the compliance with the above-mentioned judgment (supra Having Seen clause No. 1). In said brief, the State asserted that, as regards Operative Paragraph eleven of the Judgment, the Dirección General del Sistema Penitenciario (General Directorate of the Penitentiary System) “through the Directora de Salud Integral (Director of Integral Health) informed that the professionals of the Centro de Alta Seguridad Escuintla (Escuintla Maximum Security Center) provide medical assistance [...] and psychological support to Ramírez.” The State alleged that the medical reports contained information about the diseases and disorders of Ramírez as well as his general health condition. Moreover, it stated that "the psychological report concludes that Ramírez was not mentally disordered.” 5. The brief of December 19, 2005, whereby the State submitted information relative to the compliance with the Judgment as regards payment of US$5,000.00 (five thousand United States dollars) as costs reimbursement. It particularly informed that “it reinforces its commitment […] to effectively reimburse the costs and expenses by means of a money transfer to the account of Instituto de Estudios Comparados en Ciencias Penales (Institute of Comparative Studies of Criminal Sciences) before the end of [2005]. 6. The brief of July 04, 2006, whereby the State submitted a new report on the compliance with the Judgment and stated: a) As regards the provisions of Operative Paragraph seven of the Judgment concerning the institution of new proceedings against Fermín Ramírez “the Supreme Court of Justice rendered Agreement No. 96-2006, whereby it instructed the Tribunal de Sentencia Penal, Narcoactividad y