A) Proposed by the Commission 1) Ernesto Villanueva Villanueva, lawyer, who shall render an expert assessment of the perspective of the international law and the international good practices regarding the access to public information contained in the files of the intelligence service, the armed forces and the police as from domestic laws on access to public information. Proposed by the representatives: 2) Carlos Castresana Castresana, lawyer, who shall render an expert opinion on justice administration, the domestic criminal investigations conducted in cases of human rights violations and the denial of justice in Guatemala; 3) Bernardo R. Morales Figueroa, engineer and mathematician, who shall render an expert opinion on the amount as loss of income according to what applies to the individual direct victims of the instant case; 4) Silvio René Gramajo Valdés, bachelor in communication, who shall render an expert opinion on the functioning in the practice of the law on access to information; the rules of the information offices at state entities and the use, by the State, of the definition of national security or secret information of the State; 5) Alejandro Valencia Villa, lawyer, who shall render an expert opinion on intelligence activities; patterns and operations, and 6) Carlos Martin Beristain, physician, who shall render an expert opinion on the psychological sufferings of the victims and their relatives, caused by the alleged facts of the case and the necessary measures to repair the damage. 2. To require the representatives and the State to forward, if pertinent, according to Considering clause twenty-five of this Order, and within the nonrenewable term that expires on March 28, 2012, the questions they deem pertinent to ask through the Inter-American Court to the declarants offered by the opposing parties indicated in operative paragraph one of this Order. The statements and expert opinions required in operative paragraph one shall be presented no later than April 20, 2012. On that same date, the State must submit the actuarial study so offered (supra Considering clause 31). 3. To require the Commission, the representatives and the State to coordinate and take the necessary actions for the declarants, witnesses and expert witnesses so proposed to include, once the questions from the opposing parties have been received, the respective answers in their statements rendered through affidavits, according to Considering clause twenty-five of this Order. 4. To order the Secretariat of the Inter-American Court, once the statements and expert opinions required in operative paragraph one have been received, to transmit them to the other parties so that the representatives and the State present, if they wish so, the observations to such statements and expert opinions together with their final written arguments, at the latest. Likewise, the Tribunal shall transmit the actuarial study offered by the State so that the Commission and the representatives present, at the same procedural opportunity, the observations they deem pertinent (supra Considering clause 31). 5. To convene the Republic of Guatemala, the representatives of the alleged victims and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights to a public hearing to 11