to the application of late payment interest to the amounts due for restitution, it is interpreted that such interest is already included in the form of calculation established for the payment, pursuant to article 63 of the Labor Code, and must be applied to the readjusted amounts still due until the time of actual payment. Finally, with respect to the request for interpretation on the calculation of interest in cases where the heirs of any of the beneficiaries are not determined or, even if they are determined, the inheritance proceedings have not been carried out, it is declared inadmissible. D. On the procedure for the search for heirs in respect of beneficiaries who die or have died in the course of the enforcement of the Judgment D.1. Arguments of the parties and the Commission 40. The State requested clarification as to whether the notice mechanism indicated in paragraph 234 of the Judgment to resolve the situation of the three cases of deceased victims whose heirs could not be determined could be used to determine the beneficiaries who eventually die during the time of execution of the Judgment. 41. The representatives argued that, given the large number of victims of senior age, and their gradual death, the determination of their present and future heirs, based on the domestic legal system, requires additional measures of care and protection for the beneficiary victims and their heirs, so as to protect their wishes of transcendence and legacy. Thus, they considered that the proposal to use the mechanism provided for in the paragraph for other victims, who have a legal representative with sufficient power of attorney, "makes no sense and exposes the heirs of the victims to unnecessary publicity", since there are mechanisms in the domestic legal system that allow for the identification of a person's heirs. 42. The Commission noted that clarifying the points raised by the State can facilitate the process of monitoring compliance with the judgment and expedite compliance with the reparation measures, which is extremely important in the instant case given the advanced age of the victims. However, it did not refer to the points raised in the requests for interpretation. D.2. Considerations of the Court 43. Paragraph 234 of the Judgment establishes the following: 234. If beneficiaries have passed away or should pass away prior to the payment of their due compensation, the money shall be delivered directly to their heirs under the terms of applicable domestic legislation. This Court acknowledges that the representatives have no information about the heirs of victims María Graciela Cisternas Cisternas, María Apolina Lara Pereira and Heriberto Antonio Martínez Salazar. The Court deems, in this regard, that in order to determine these peoples’ heirs, the State must run a notice in at least three editions of the Official Gazette, over the course of six months, calling on the next of kin of these individuals to report with the necessary information and informing them of the procedure to be followed for these purposes. 44. The State asked whether the mechanism established in this paragraph could be used to determine the beneficiaries of the victims who die during the execution stage of the Judgment. In this regard, this Court reiterates that the parties must read the Judgment as a whole and not consider each paragraph of the Judgment as if it were independent of the 11