13. The petitioner stated that according to witnesses, his body was taken to the Army General Staff in one of the ambulances used in the violent assault on the COB. The petitioner emphasized that according to what the accused themselves stated, both Marcelo Quiroga Santa Cruz and Juan Carlos Flores Bedregal were last seen at the Army General Staff but it is not clear whether they were alive. The petitioner stated that since that day the family has no knowledge of their brother or the location of his remains, although they began a tireless search in which they have submitted complaints to all agencies. 14. Regarding those complaints, the petitioner stated that on that same day, July 17, 1980, the relatives of Juan Carlos Flores denounced his disappearance nationally and internationally, which fact was recorded by the International Red Cross, Amnesty International, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, the Commission of the [World] Council of Churches, and other institutions. The petitioner added that months later the International Red Cross informed his relatives regarding the murder of the alleged victim, but without any clarification regarding the circumstances or the location of his remains. 15. The petitioner noted that after the return to democracy, in 1984 the government created the National Commission on the Disappeared with the mandate to investigate forced disappearances for political motives. She stated that family members again reported the disappearance of the alleged victim to this commission, which conducted some investigations in which police agents of the repressive apparatus of the dictatorship declared that the lifeless bodies of Marcelo Quiroga and Juan Carlos Flores were collected and handled. She added that these police agents provided false information that led to three exhumations of remains that upon study were determined not to belong to the alleged victim. 16. The petitioner stated that subsequently the relatives of Juan Carlos Flores Bedregal asked the Justice Committee of the House of Delegates to initiate a proceeding against Luís García Meza and his collaborators in the coup d’état of 1980. She stated that once the Parliament issued a resolution on the accusation – which included the assault on the COB and the murder of the alleged victim – the relatives became a civil party to the trial of responsibilities before the Supreme Court of Justice. In the view of the petitioner, although the trial concluded on April 21, 1993 with the conviction of the former dictator and eight other implicated persons, due to the characteristics of the proceeding, the murders that occurred during the takeover of the COB were not made clear nor was the location of the bodies determined. 17. The petitioner stated that due to errors in that investigation, on October 23, 1997 a commission was created to investigate the disappearance of Marcelo Quiroga Santa Cruz and thus that of Juan Carlos Flores, since both disappeared under the same circumstances. She stated that in 1999, based on the evidence gathered, this Commission delivered a report to the Superior Court of the District of La Paz recommending that a proceeding be opened up against some twenty repressive agents, among them military, police, and paramilitary personnel, based on their participation in the attack on the COB. 18. She indicated that in response to this report, in February 1999 the Public Prosecutor’s Office initiated a proceeding against 17 individuals, in which the relatives of the alleged victim have acted as an intervening party. The petitioner emphasized the most relevant stages in the process, relating that on April 18, 2001 the Examining Magistrate issued a final order to investigate the crimes of armed insurrection against the security and sovereignty of the State, terrorism, concealment, and murder. She indicated that the final hearing was held in the court proceeding on September 26, 2007, leading to the reading of the conclusions.

Select target paragraph3